Slate Chocolate Marble
Slate Chocolate Marble

Led Zeppelin Official Forum

Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to contribute to this site by submitting your own content or replying to existing content. You'll be able to customize your profile, while also communicating with other members via your own private inbox, plus much more! This message will be removed once you have signed in.

osoz

So is Jimmy Page a 'sloppy' player?

341 posts in this topic

Yes, Jimmy Page was a sloppy player. Not that he couldn't be a very fluid player, see his 1968-1971 and previous session work playing. But he consciously chose form over function with regards to his playing style and presentation. Every inch he lowered his guitar his fluidity took a hit and resulted in sloppiness. From 1975 on he had horrible pick attack on his strings. This resulted in his consistent breaking of strings, the Earls Court version of Stairway To Heaven on the dvd bares this out. I can't find it at the moment but I've read an interview article where Jimmy stated he had to adopt his playing style to incorporate the lowered guitar and stance.

Edited by tyler19

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The thing with the real low-slung guitar, wasn't that actually because Page said(I can't remember) that that was necessary

because of back or shoulder trouble ?? Also Jimmy had overlong arms and big hands. I have those attributes as well

and it's easier to play than it would seem. I mean if Jimmy was doing some serious jazz, absolutely  the guitar would be

much higher. And there are pictures from 73' where Jimmy is just a inch or two away from 77'  gunslinger. Still, it

seems rather foolish, but with my overlong arms, I can't have the guitar halfway up my chest.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Mithril46 said:

The thing with the real low-slung guitar, wasn't that actually because Page said(I can't remember) that that was necessary

because of back or shoulder trouble ?? Also Jimmy had overlong arms and big hands. I have those attributes as well

and it's easier to play than it would seem. I mean if Jimmy was doing some serious jazz, absolutely  the guitar would be

much higher. And there are pictures from 73' where Jimmy is just a inch or two away from 77'  gunslinger. Still, it

seems rather foolish, but with my overlong arms, I can't have the guitar halfway up my chest.

Regardless of ones arm length a guitar should not go lower than the waist / crotch midpoint, anything lower and you may do damage to your fretting hand in particular through the increased likelihood of tendonitis and carpel tunnel syndrome due to the stress of the wrist - forearm angle. Also, the lower the guitar is the lower the center of gravity which would result in an exaggeration of back problems, not a reduction of.

This also explains why when Jimmy played acoustic (sitting down) he always played spot on, even in his most messed up periods. Those acoustic sets and most BMS/WS from 77' were excellent and precise.

Jimmy had enough problem performing live while both high and drunk from 77' on, slinging the guitar that low was just sauce for the goose. Looked cool though...style over substance.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, IpMan said:

Regardless of ones arm length a guitar should not go lower than the waist / crotch midpoint, anything lower and you may do damage to your fretting hand in particular through the increased likelihood of tendonitis and carpel tunnel syndrome due to the stress of the wrist - forearm angle. Also, the lower the guitar is the lower the center of gravity which would result in an exaggeration of back problems, not a reduction of.

This also explains why when Jimmy played acoustic (sitting down) he always played spot on, even in his most messed up periods. Those acoustic sets and most BMS/WS from 77' were excellent and precise.

Jimmy had enough problem performing live while both  high and drunk from 77 ' on, slinging the guitar that low was just sauce for the goose. Looked cool though...style over substance.

Thank you, Mel Bay.

Let's take a quick moment to summarize what we know:

LP Man = bar mitzvah, Quiceneras, & jr. High School dances

Jimmy Page = Worldwide acclaim and musical immortality

What kind of a nut climbs on this board to tell Jimmy Page how he shoulda held his guitar?  Somehow, someway, 39 years later, Page's turbulent '77 output is collected, shared and still enjoyed by apparently many despite the fact he couldn't figure out how to hold a guitar.  Go figure.

Jimmy Page, style over substance. Astute observation. I'll keep that in mind next time i spin my favs from '77.

My Les Paul has been hanging below my waist for pert near 30 years and i haven't experienced any of those symptoms. But maybe that's why i'm not playing any Quiceneras. Dios mio!

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Badgeholder Still said:

Thank you, Mel Bay.

Let's take a quick moment to summarize what we know:

LP Man = bar mitzvah, Quiceneras, & jr. High School dances

Jimmy Page = Worldwide acclaim and musical immortality

What kind of a nut climbs on this board to tell Jimmy Page how he shoulda held his guitar?  Somehow, someway, 39 years later, Page's turbulent '77 output is collected, shared and still enjoyed by apparently many despite the fact he couldn't figure out how to hold a guitar.  Go figure.

Jimmy Page, style over substance. Astute observation. I'll keep that in mind next time i spin my favs from '77.

My Les Paul has been hanging below my waist for pert near 30 years and i haven't experienced any of those symptoms. But maybe that's why i'm not playing any Quiceneras. Dios mio!

 

What's wrong Badge, is your cat spurning your advances again? Just do what Trump does and grab that pussy. Of course it will hiss and spit, and possibly even piss on you but hey, if you're into that sort of thing who am I to judge, I just play bar mitzvahs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 hours ago, IpMan said:

What's wrong Badge, is your cat spurning your advances again? Just do what Trump does and grab that pussy. Of course it will hiss and spit, and possibly even piss on you but hey, if you're into that sort of thing who am I to judge, I just play bar mitzvahs.

Don't be modest, you lay down plenty of judgements around here. And chin up - you pay bar mitzvahs, Quiceneras, and jr. High School dances.

Is there a snowball's chance you could stay on topic? You never did expound on SRV's one trick. And my cat's sexual appetite really has nothing to do with Jimmy's guitar strap.

Living in the moment, Jimmy's playing produced results reflecting honesty too raw for some listeners. He took chances to get those results and personally i'll forgive the lows because the highs are so rewarding. Generalizing this as sloppy playing mystifies me.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Badgeholder Still said:

Don't be modest, you lay down plenty of judgements around here. And chin up - you pay bar mitzvahs, Quiceneras, and jr. High School dances.

Is there a snowball's chance you could stay on topic? You never did expound on SRV's one trick. And my cat's sexual appetite really has nothing to do with Jimmy's guitar strap.

Living in the moment, Jimmy's playing produced results reflecting honesty too raw for some listeners. He took chances to get those results and personally i'll forgive the lows because the highs are so rewarding. Generalizing this as sloppy playing mystifies me.

 

I can't believe you took the bar mitzvahs and Quinceanera bit seriously. C'mon man. I never claimed to be Jimmy Page or even Jimmy Fallon on guitar, I play in a local bar band and we enjoy ourselves. 

SRV's one trick was he played in a consistent blues style, he was no Page, he did not push any boundaries. Was he an amazing player hell yes, did I enjoy his music, hell yes, I just commented that I did not like his tone as I prefer a more percussive tone vs. a clean, twangy tone as SRV had. It's just my opinion, who cares.

I love Jimmy's playing, all phases, all times otherwise why would I be on this forum. Jimmy Page is second only to Jimi Hendrix to me and only barely. I am simply lamenting the fact of his addiction appearing to prefer the presentation over the performance. It appeared Jimmy pushed the rock star persona to the limit, sacrificing his craft at times toward that purpose. Believe me, I understand, I was around in the 70's though a child, I was still very aware. I believe Jimmy thought that since none of the 77' tour was being professionally recorded he could focus on the visuals. Plus, I can guarantee even the infamous Tempe show sounded god damned awesome if you were there live. The combination of volume, distortion, and ambience can make even a poor performance sound like music from the gods. Hindsight is 20/20 and Jimmy, nor anyone else, had any idea all these boots would be out there and available, in all their soundboard glory, for everyone through social media and the like. And of course the drugs just added to that attitude.

Jimmy is my main influence on guitar, even more than Hendrix because he pushed the boundaries, played different styles, and even re-invented his whole approach to guitar in the 80's with the b-Bender...who else has done that? 

It's all good Badge, we all like to sling barbs here and there but I hope you know it is just in jest, In hold no animosity.

Have a good night and give your cat a nice handy for me will ya. Peace Brother.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
24 minutes ago, IpMan said:

I can't believe you took the bar mitzvahs and Quinceanera bit seriously. C'mon man. I never claimed to be Jimmy Page or even Jimmy Fallon on guitar, I play in a local bar band and we enjoy ourselves. 

SRV's one trick was he played in a consistent blues style, he was no Page, he did not push any boundaries. Was he an amazing player hell yes, did I enjoy his music, hell yes, I just commented that I did not like his tone as I prefer a more percussive tone vs. a clean, twangy tone as SRV had. It's just my opinion, who cares.

I love Jimmy's playing, all phases, all times otherwise why would I be on this forum. Jimmy Page is second only to Jimi Hendrix to me and only barely. I am simply lamenting the fact of his addiction appearing to prefer the presentation over the performance. It appeared Jimmy pushed the rock star persona to the limit, sacrificing his craft at times toward that purpose. Believe me, I understand, I was around in the 70's though a child, I was still very aware. I believe Jimmy thought that since none of the 77' tour was being professionally recorded he could focus on the visuals. Plus, I can guarantee even the infamous Tempe show sounded god damned awesome if you were there live. The combination of volume, distortion, and ambience can make even a poor performance sound like music from the gods. Hindsight is 20/20 and Jimmy, nor anyone else, had any idea all these boots would be out there and available, in all their soundboard glory, for everyone through social media and the like. And of course the drugs just added to that attitude.

Jimmy is my main influence on guitar, even more than Hendrix because he pushed the boundaries, played different styles, and even re-invented his whole approach to guitar in the 80's with the b-Bender...who else has done that? 

It's all good Badge, we all like to sling barbs here and there but I hope you know it is just in jest, In hold no animosity.

Have a good night and give your cat a nice handy for me will ya. Peace Brother.

Agreed , on all counts.  Jimmy Page, innovator , soulful, creative, multi- faceted and sloppy. SRV was most definitely a one or two dimensional player. A great modern blues player and that's about it.  I really liked his playing though and when I heard him live at the University of Chicago in 1983 I was blown away. But most of his solos sound the same and I only listen to him once in a great while.  However,  Page I can listen to everyday, except for 77 and 80. No comparison as far as interesting soundscapes and compositions. Page had a way bigger arsenal of styles and sounds. SRV was way more precise than Page live but not as musically broad . 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Also, this thread title should be "Was Jimmy Page a Sloppy Player". Jimmy Page doesn't play anymore, as woefully demonstrated by his absence from the live music scene for years and his refusal/unwillingness to strap on a guitar and jam on a blues in Tokyo recently. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The SRV thing, totally agree, not too broad. But don't ever dare say that around a fan, or that Jimmy was a visionary

and SRV was just a great PLAYER. Hot tamales !!! Also Page's gunslinger pose, Ipman is right on certain accounts that

from a standpoint of physics it can be harmful to various body parts to hang a guitar so low. But also Page's Les Paul's

were lighter than normal,  and if there was damage caused, why was Page still wearing the LP's low( not like 77'), but

still low ?? Think about baseball, where you have quite a few .300 + hitters whose batting stance is all wrong , the

follow thru is all wrong, everything is contradictory to success. About the sudden acoustic "perfection", (77'), I have

played standing up drunk and stoned, and then sitting down with an acoustic, yes . Of course it's easier to play, but

in many interviews Page has said at home he mainly plays acoustic, so that element of his playing may be far more

internalized than the electric, by 77' anyway. And if you listen to Page playing with Roy Harper in 2011, again Page

plays excellent. But a major contradiction in 77': the sitting down usuallly chaotic versions of White Summer/Black

Mountainside. Page simply didn't rehearse it much, of course the substances are also there. But the mention of style

over substance, the visuals, etc., definetly a factor in all this as well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 18/11/2016 at 1:45 PM, Badgeholder Still said:

i'll forgive the lows because the highs are so rewarding.

nuff said.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think it was just a case of Page being committed to how the shows looked visually but also of being committed to a certain playing style up to and including the 77 tour. Zep had always had the "tight but loose" seat of your pants style of playing rather than something more rehearsed yet as you got to the bands latter years I think you were often dealing with material that made this less suitable. There was some decline as well but I think you can see in 79 for example a switch towards a more rehearsed style and performance(at least the Denmark shows and the first Knedworth) that are considerably more polished.

I have to say though that when it comes to listening to a lot of material I prefer 77, there are obviously limited shows from 79 but if that year had involved a big tour I'm not sure I'd be greatly interested in hearing more than 3-4 shows anyway, the same with the P&P tours. I can imagine it being similar for Page playing, the looser style was probably more fulfilling to play night after night.

Edited by greenman

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well those are some interesting observations. But talking about Jimmy, he was the most problematic concerning the

looseness. Some totally champion Page's live playing from 68'-73' for example, but even then here and there you will

find the "seeds" of what could result with Jimmy with lack of practice, drugs, etc. It is also telling that the further Jimmy

got away from sessions and constant touring, so the technique declined. Nobody else in Zep screwed up like Jimmy.

Also most consider the two 79' Copenhagen shows as a real return to glory, whereas, sure, the Knebworth shows

got really mixed reviews. IMO the95'-96' P&P shows were average to excellent, but the 98', Page has almost shredder

technique and some of the solos match up almost to 73' Zep levels. In fact of all the 98' shows I have, Page is not sloppy,

and no solo/song is below above average.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You seem to hold up "shredder" as the ultimate standard to meet but I and many others would disagree with that. I think theres a clear trade off in moving to a more rehearsed style rather than the looser one we saw up to 77, less energy and sense of wildness/unpredictability to the performance.

As has been mentioned if you listen to the acoustic set in 77 and Page was most certainly capable of playing in a slicker fashion but chose not to for the electric material. Its I think this looser style that needed him in his best form to carry off most effectively hence the results becoming patchier with longer layoffs between touring and issues with injuries/drugs. Still though for me when it did come off even by 77 I think the results are superior that anything we've heard since, I'll definitely take say the LA 77 shows over any Page and Plant 98 show.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I saw a couple Page Plant shows from all their tours. In 98 Jimmy was playing extremely well but it's not Zeppelin so I'm in the "I'll take a 77 show over Page and Plant camp"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't get me wrong I'm not knocking those shows, they are very good and preferable to some Zep performances for me but still I think they are much more obviously rehearsed and lacking in the same wild power as the better 77 shows still had.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, juxtiphi said:

I saw a couple Page Plant shows from all their tours. In 98 Jimmy was playing extremely well but it's not Zeppelin so I'm in the "I'll take a 77 show over Page and Plant camp"

True that. And he never had the "Zep tone" again on these P&P shows.  If you listen to the official recordings like TSRTS or HTWWW... he had a big sound!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 18.11.2016 at 7:09 AM, porgie66 said:

Agreed , on all counts.  Jimmy Page, innovator , soulful, creative, multi- faceted and sloppy. SRV was most definitely a one or two dimensional player. A great modern blues player and that's about it.  I really liked his playing though and when I heard him live at the University of Chicago in 1983 I was blown away. But most of his solos sound the same and I only listen to him once in a great while.  However,  Page I can listen to everyday, except for 77 and 80. No comparison as far as interesting soundscapes and compositions. Page had a way bigger arsenal of styles and sounds. SRV was way more precise than Page live but not as musically broad . 

Jimmy played Rock, Blues and Folk. SRV played Rock, Blues and Jazz. Doesn't seem to me that Page was more versatile then Stevie.  Page was more influential, surely. He came to the scene 10+ years earlier than Stevie. So all of Stevie's solos sound the same to you? That is rather rubbish! Stevie was known for making a solo more interesting the longer it goes. Listen to his version of "Little Wing" or his song "Lenny". Page doesn't even come close to that!

Of course,  this is a matter of personal taste. I enjoy Zep's music more than SRV's, but Page didn't write the Zep songs alone.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, the-ocean87 said:

Jimmy played Rock, Blues and Folk. SRV played Rock, Blues and Jazz. Doesn't seem to me that Page was more versatile then Stevie.  Page was more influential, surely. He came to the scene 10+ years earlier than Stevie. So all of Stevie's solos sound the same to you? That is rather rubbish! Stevie was known for making a solo more interesting the longer it goes. Listen to his version of "Little Wing" or his song "Lenny". Page doesn't even come close to that!

Of course,  this is a matter of personal taste. I enjoy Zep's music more than SRV's, but Page didn't write the Zep songs alone.

Personal taste indeed. I strongly disagree, Page was clearly more versatile than Stevie. Consider all the variety of styles and influences represented in the Zeppelin catalog compared to Stevie's. The different effects that Jimmy either pioneered or commanded in his arsenal, the use of alternate tunings, the variety of sonics, the compositional variety. I'm certain that his experience in the London session scene contributed to his versatility. Stevie was a great blues player, but he didn't have that breadth of variety. Also, when did Stevie Ray Vaughan play Jazz? He is by no means a jazz player. Talk about rather rubbish! Still, Jimmy was sloppier. 

Edited by porgie66

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, porgie66 said:

Personal taste indeed. I strongly disagree, Page was clearly more versatile than Stevie. Consider all the variety of styles and influences represented in the Zeppelin catalog compared to Stevie's. The different effects that Jimmy either pioneered or commanded in his arsenal, the use of alternate tunings, the variety of sonics, the compositional variety. I'm certain that his experience in the London session scene contributed to his versatility. Stevie was a great blues player, but he didn't have that breadth of variety. Also, when did Stevie Ray Vaughan play Jazz? He is by no means a jazz player. Talk about rather rubbish! Still, Jimmy was sloppier. 

Here is Stevie playing jazz. He recorded a number of jazz tunes. Of course he is no George Benson or McLaughlin but his jazz playing is as good as Jimmy's folk playing IMO.

 The use of effects isn't something I'd call "versatile". I think about versatility in being able to play different styles of music.

Stevie had a much better technique and more feeling. Jimmy wrote better songs and was more experimental. I like them both a LOT, but if I could choose whose playing capabilities I'd like to have I'd chose Stevie's.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Stevie playing jazz does still sound like Stevie to me though where as I do think theres a more significant divide in sound(beyond FX/tone)with Page playing different styles, his folk playing really doesn't sound at all like his bluesy playing for example.

Not sure I'v say Stevie had more "feeling" so much as the two of them tended to be aiming at rather different results, Page was generally either going for power/drama or very relaxed folk where as Stevie was naturally much more playful/friendly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 hours ago, the-ocean87 said:

Jimmy played Rock, Blues and Folk. SRV played Rock, Blues and Jazz. Doesn't seem to me that Page was more versatile then Stevie.  Page was more influential, surely. He came to the scene 10+ years earlier than Stevie. So all of Stevie's solos sound the same to you? That is rather rubbish! Stevie was known for making a solo more interesting the longer it goes. Listen to his version of "Little Wing" or his song "Lenny". Page doesn't even come close to that!

Of course,  this is a matter of personal taste. I enjoy Zep's music more than SRV's, but Page didn't write the Zep songs alone.

SRV didn't write his songs alone either, only a handful. Half of any SRV albums consisted of covers, and Doyle Bramhall was a major writing partner of SRV's from the beginning. SRV was one motherfucker of a guitarist, no doubt, but when it comes to songwriting..... he's not even close to Jimmy Page.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On November 16, 2016 at 10:28 PM, Badgeholder Still said:

Thank you, Mel Bay.

Let's take a quick moment to summarize what we know:

LP Man = bar mitzvah, Quiceneras, & jr. High School dances

Jimmy Page = Worldwide acclaim and musical immortality

What kind of a nut climbs on this board to tell Jimmy Page how he shoulda held his guitar?  Somehow, someway, 39 years later, Page's turbulent '77 output is collected, shared and still enjoyed by apparently many despite the fact he couldn't figure out how to hold a guitar.  Go figure.

Jimmy Page, style over substance. Astute observation. I'll keep that in mind next time i spin my favs from '77.

My Les Paul has been hanging below my waist for pert near 30 years and i haven't experienced any of those symptoms. But maybe that's why i'm not playing any Quiceneras. Dios mio!

 

Thank you, Mel Bay, best opening to a reply I've ever heard, LOL LOL LOL

mel-bay-guitar-670x405.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 02/10/2015 at 10:35 PM, osoz said:

I've always found Clapton kind of dull all too studied and sanitised for my ears. Have to be honest that I initially posted the question because it was something I had seen said over and over. I think I understand better now what people meant by it, or at least the relevance of the 'sloppy' term to my own study of jimmy's playing.

Totally off topic I know but in regard to EC I've always felt his biggest break post Cream was Peter Green losing it completely to the point of growing his fingernails into talons because that man was exceptional and overshadowed EC in every way.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Mmm, ok is Jimmy Page sloppy or not. At times yes but that doesn't lessen his ability and fluidity when he's on his true form nor somehow reflect on him as somehow a less accomplished or 'agricultural' player not in the technical skill or true musical ability of the Vai's and Satriani's that have been touted as true virtuosos many times throughout this topic.

Think of it this way.The likes of said technique junkie, fret wanking, whammy bar, two handed tapping, scale burning maestros come from that Neo-Classical school of guitar player pioneered by I'd hesitantly say EVH and Randy Rhodes who you could say were the ones who if not the founders of that offshoot of rock/metal guitar style then the ones who truly brought it to a wider audience and set the early rules for the Paul Gilberts, Marty Friedmanns,Dave Mustaines to follow.

I hesitate, again, to loudly champion one of that styles heaviest hitters and most sneered at, that loveable and oh so modest retiring Swedish gent Yngwie Malmsteen because I've always felt he had a great deal more substance behind the shiny metallic crap of his outward image.He genuinely was Classically inspired,living and breathing Classical music in a way the others tipped their hat to.I always felt they used it as a vehicle, Vai and Satriani in particular where as it was Malmsteens alpha and omega.His playing does move me in a way Vai and especially Satriani completely fail to.Not in anyway does that detract from their incredible ability.

Anyway, I digress or I did some way back. That whole. discipline of guitar with it's fundamental roots more entrenched in Classical Music than traditional blues and folk inspired rock is by it's very nature going to be infinitely more structured,theory and protocol based than the very freeform, spontaneous and DIY nature of folk music and blues that inspire the likes of Jimmy Page. So to compare them like for like and say that Page isn't as technically proficient is understandable but to then go on to suggest that therefore he isn't quite as musically able or somehow lesser than those of the more modern types doesn’t follow because their fundamentally different despite being guitarists.

Another way to put it is Mr James Marshall Hendrix is the only man I've seen who never once looked close to playing near the limit of his ability, if he had such a limit which I truly doubt. His like come along every few centuries and he truly stands beside Mozart in the genius states. I say that with no ironic intent, fully understanding the claim I'm making and fully believing it as true incase anyone wonders.The point being, even Jimi would possibly 'seem' less technically proficient next to the  Vaitriani's yet there's two of them in the same time frame, one Hendrix every few centuries so tearing the fretboard apart with a modified Japanese Mixolydian/Aeolian Mode (if that remotely exists) isn't a true hallmark if your musical or even playing ability, just your mastery of the rules perhaps.

Jimmy Page was such a groundbreaking guitar player in a number of ways that he almost seemed to set him self up to be knocked down by all the lesser players, jealous guitarists that were made to stand aside while Jimmy was brought in to play the solos on their own singles.

Pete Townshend on I Can't Explain springs to mind for which he'll bear that grudge to the grave but it happened with The Kinks and countless others in the period before becoming a Yardbird. The fact he was in a league above all those players he  was brought in as a sessions man on their records pissed off many of the guitarist of his times. He fell out with Clapton over some home made recordings they taped too so there was plenty of appetite to make the claim he was actually over rated, not as musically adept or technically accomplished as believed by those who don't really know better and definitely nowhere near as good as he believed himself to be.

The odd thing is how that idea has seeped into the consciousness of genuine rock fans outside of the music industry in recent years. Much like anything else

the good old interweb has disseminated these ideas out into the real world with understated efficiency without anyone really noticing or deliberately setting it in motion.

Yes he drops bum notes,has periods where it's plain to hear he hasn't been putting in the hard practice to hone his skills and get back into true form.

Drugs, fame and who knows what other distractions were often at the root of why he wasn't putting in the 100% dedication you'd expect. Maybe complacency too because when you're at the pinnacle of the music world and enjoying the unheard of rewards and success Zep earned at their peak then you could imagine someone perhaps not feeling that raw hunger to improve and progress they felt climbing to that height.

Besides he was much more than simply the guitar player of the band. He was a serious songwriter/composer,engineer,had the drive and vision for so many aspects of their music from how it was recorded, presented, marketed etc. In many ways although their were four equal members in the band Jimmy Page was Led Zeppelin.

Like I say, for every mortal musician below JH it's at best subjective and more often stormy and fraught with insensed feelings to start judging one guitarist against another. On what exact criteria do you judge, we wouldn't agree on that, who to fairly judge against who I doubt 3 real rock lovers would find a real consensus there either. Do we compare players of similar styles, eras or just a massive free for all. Even. if we could agree the terms on how to judge the results would cause world war 3.

Probably half of you reading this think I'm talking out my arse by raising Jimi Hendrix up so high so to expect to navigate our way to a rough narrative about what Page's rough bits of playing mean, if anything at all isn't that likely to occur...... but who expected it to anyway. lol.

What annnoys me in a silly but not really important way is the idea that he's sloppy because he's about feel rather than ability or skill. That sounds so much like making excuses for a man who absolutely has nothing to make excuses about.

Feel is such a nebulous and vague phrase that sounds so good but doesn't really mean much or more truthfully means something a little different to each one of us. I'd sooner say that his playing often had real movement and plain groove to it that very few rock bands ever managed to capture.

Almost a funkiness to the monolithic riffing unlike the Sabbaths and Purples of the time. While being unashamedly blues drenched rock Jimmy wasn't bound by those confines. Some of his live lead work could feel a bit disjointed compared to on vinyl but it wasn't the same music despite being the same song. How do you play 3 or 4 guitar tracks that were overdubbed in the studio om one 6 stringer on stage. Often he found different and new approaches that breathed a new and fresher life to the music when it was played live.

Afterall music is of the present moment, it's not set in stone like a novel or a painting but in it's truest form it's living and breathing. Each time it's played or sung it's created anew.

It ia about feelings, stories, being alive, life at it's best and worst. That's the essence of the blues but also real folk music before it began to stand for wooly jumpered,crafty arty types.

Traditionally it was about the pain of the poor downtrodden folk of England, Scotland, Ireland etc who suffered at the hands of the rich n powerful just like the singers of the blues did in more modern times but being white,from centuries past and British it obviously doesn't resonate the same despite being part of where the Blues itself came from.

All these many disperate strands are woven into Jimmy Pages music in ways not always immediately apparent but none the less making it stand out from all the rest that came and went between then and now.

Again as for his playing style I really cannot see how anyone could say he wasn't at times at the very peak of guitar playing ability. SRTS has some moments of playing that will stand alone even 150 years from now, just aslong as

are still beings around who can appreciate music. As for sheer quality to rival anythong else on vinyl you can't ask for better than his playing on No Quarter.

After listening to that and Since I've Been Loving You is the question of sloppiness or lesser ability remotely relevant.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now