Slate Chocolate Marble
Slate Chocolate Marble

Led Zeppelin Official Forum

Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to contribute to this site by submitting your own content or replying to existing content. You'll be able to customize your profile, while also communicating with other members via your own private inbox, plus much more! This message will be removed once you have signed in.

irondirigible

QUESTIONS ABOUT LED ZEPPELIN BOOTLEG RECORDINGS

14 posts in this topic

I know that they are basically not legal to possess, trade, or sell unless one owns the rights to them.

 

I see there are TONS of Led Zep bootlegs.  Who owns them?  Who would have the rights to them?

 

And I am wondering... will we see more of them come out as official releases, like How The West Was Won (which, I assume contains material previously available as a bootleg)

 

I think Led Zeppelin fans would only be too happy to see a Zeppelin version of the "From The Vaults" series as Rolling Stones fans have enjoyed in recent years.  Many of those Stones recordings were once boots.  I am sure there is much more out there that Led Zeppelin could release as live albums.  We know that the chances of them reuniting and making new material is pretty slim.  (okay, a reunion is not impossible but new music is hard to imagine)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I will reply to this inquiry and this is just my opinion, I do not think that any "real bootleg" from Led Zeppelin in the 1970's will ever come out as an official release.  That will never happen. 

I used to buy Led Zeppelin bootlegs in late 1980's/early 1990's when I used to go to New York City and pay $25 for a single compact disc.  I probably accumulated at least 50-75 LZ bootlegs on my many forays into NYC.  That was about 25+ years ago.

Since the advent of YouTube, I know that I will never spend another dollar on Led Zeppelin bootlegs (the ones that I did not purchase way back then), because I can listen to hundreds of different Led Zeppelin bootlegs for free on said website. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i too recall the days of bootleg CDs being for sale for lots of major artists. I would guess all these same boots we're around on LP or cassette prior to that.  Now all this stuff is free and readily available.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

But, the rock star [Page] said: "The legitimate part is where fans trade music, but once you start packaging it up and you do not know what you are getting, you are breaking the rules legally and morally.

"There are some of these recordings where it is just a whirring and you cannot hear the music.

"If you have something like this that appears legitimate then it is just not right."

Page then told how he went into a major record store in New York and caught them selling pirate Led Zeppelin music.

He said: "I went to check what they had for the band and Jimmy Page and found a gig from Earl's Court in London

"I do not know where it surfaced from, but I contacted my New York lawyers to say the shop was selling something as if it was official, but clearly it was not."

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/scotland/glasgow_and_west/6917449.stm

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/scotland/glasgow_and_west/6970651.stm

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's he way I see it --

 

Selling bootlegs of artists should be illegal.  It's no different than someone photo copying the latest Stephen King novel and selling it to make money.


What I seriously question is the hardcore Led Zeppelin fan downloading a full concert and keeping it for her/his own enjoyment whenever they wish.  Let's say she/he has been a fan for many years, spent plenty on concerts, albums, merchandise, totally loves the band.  You're telling that this person downloading that concert constitutes an immoral act?

But  yeah, selling boots for profit is wrong and is illegal whether we are talking about selling a copy of a Miley Cyrus song or a '75 concert of our beloved Led Zeppelin

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

7 hours ago, irondirigible said:

i too recall the days of bootleg CDs being for sale for lots of major artists. I would guess all these same boots we're around on LP or cassette prior to that.  Now all this stuff is free and readily available.

 

 

Nothing is ever free in life.  Just hand the car keys over to Google and let them continue to break pass the Trillion dollar mark as a powerful corporation ?  What kind of car do you drive ?  I hope you know all these so called phree hosting sites the people who run those sites are all driving BMW's.  And they also plant spyware and virus on your computer to track you and sell your info to 3rd party companies.

Edited by SymphonyX

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

5 hours ago, irondirigible said:

Here's he way I see it --

 

Selling bootlegs of artists should be illegal.  It's no different than someone photo copying the latest Stephen King novel and selling it to make money.


What I seriously question is the hardcore Led Zeppelin fan downloading a full concert and keeping it for her/his own enjoyment whenever they wish.  Let's say she/he has been a fan for many years, spent plenty on concerts, albums, merchandise, totally loves the band.  You're telling that this person downloading that concert constitutes an immoral act?

But  yeah, selling boots for profit is wrong and is illegal whether we are talking about selling a copy of a Miley Cyrus song or a '75 concert of our beloved Led Zeppelin

Your analogy is not really accurate as selling photocopies of a book is pirating officially published media, like the Beatles Mono box set I bought on Amazon for $99 that turned out to be a bootleg copy, replete with scanned artwork. That kind of thing is really fucked up. Live tapes are a different matter. They are more analogous to selling Stephen King's unpublished essays, stories, notes etc. While wrong legally, there is still tremendous demand from fans who admire the artists work. Our relationship with bootleg companies is fairly complicated. Even Page buys them, and has probably appreciated the fact that the are recorded documents of himself from the glory days. I don't mind paying for a quality release of a tape that is either unique to that bootlegger , or if they did a really smashing EQ job and great artwork. Otherwise, downloading freely traded tapes is the way to go. Yes , it may be legally "wrong" to sell  recordings of a bands music without their permission but frankly, sales of a newly surfaced soundboard tape aren't going to hurt Led Zeps financial security. 

Edited by porgie66

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Everyone in here has - or at the very least listens to Youtube boots. Things never officially released. I cannot see how Page would ever have a problem with his most die hard fans eating up every bit of recorded glory. Yes, he loses control which is no small thing, but he would know the incredible delight and appreciation in that respect. There would hardly be a member here that does not have a substantial cache of official releases and merchandise. So it is nothing to do with missed revenue. Even some of the more outstanding Youtube clips (boots). You read some of the comments and it turns people on to the band! It is a pathway into the world of Zeppelin.

Things packaged up to look official with a horrendous recording, of course that sucks. If you happen to be a casual fan, or are looking to "see what Led Zeppelin is like" and you stumble onto that and it's your first taste, you'd probably be turned off from ever actually giving Zep a fair go. It's more than a bit shit.

There was little choice but to produce and sell boots in the 80's. Now though with the webs? Ha! It's all available baby. And GOOD. By in large it leads more people in the door to Zeppelin greatness - and grab their official stuff. It overwhelmingly now benefits the band.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 5/28/2017 at 7:59 PM, irondirigible said:

I know that they are basically not legal to possess, trade, or sell unless one owns the rights to them.

 

I see there are TONS of Led Zep bootlegs.  Who owns them?  Who would have the rights to them?

 

And I am wondering... will we see more of them come out as official releases, like How The West Was Won (which, I assume contains material previously available as a bootleg)

 

I think Led Zeppelin fans would only be too happy to see a Zeppelin version of the "From The Vaults" series as Rolling Stones fans have enjoyed in recent years.  Many of those Stones recordings were once boots.  I am sure there is much more out there that Led Zeppelin could release as live albums.  We know that the chances of them reuniting and making new material is pretty slim.  (okay, a reunion is not impossible but new music is hard to imagine)

You need to read this book.

592dd2d65e487_51RITJt6QsL._SX258_BO1204203200_.jpg.4f5110a35f1c2529e309eba5218f8207.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, Strider said:

You need to read this book.

592dd2d65e487_51RITJt6QsL._SX258_BO1204203200_.jpg.4f5110a35f1c2529e309eba5218f8207.jpg

Anybody who is into collecting bootlegs needs to read that book. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Back in 2012 I started a thread about the morality of downloading bootlegs -

Got some interesting responses at the time.  I have a problem with people profiteering from the tapes stolen from Page's house because they were his personal property. In a way, downloading any bootleg is "immoral" because the royalties ain't getting paid, however JP gave an implied ok to fans trading recordings in his quote related to a court case some years ago. Runs for cover...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

36 minutes ago, nigelss said:

Back in 2012 I started a thread about the morality of downloading bootlegs -

Got some interesting responses at the time.  I have a problem with people profiteering from the tapes stolen from Page's house because they were his personal property. In a way, downloading any bootleg is "immoral" because the royalties ain't getting paid, however JP gave an implied ok to fans trading recordings in his quote related to a court case some years ago. Runs for cover...

A guy making or obtaining a bootleg LZ recording and then selling 1000 physical copies for profit is one thing.  And a fan who owns every LZ official release and tons of other LZ related items downloading a bootleg just for her/his own enjoyment is quite another thing.  I suppose both could be seen as guilty of some offence (although there would be jurisdictional issues there as well)


Anyway, not all bootlegging activity is the same.  I know a case could probably be made to say that no one should ever download or otherwise obtain an LZ boot.  But I just can't see a problem with a devoted fan wanting to hear them live back in their prime.

 

Edited by irondirigible

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

55 minutes ago, irondirigible said:

A guy making or obtaining a bootleg LZ recording and then selling 1000 physical copies for profit is one thing.  And a fan who owns every LZ official release and tons of other LZ related items downloading a bootleg just for her/his own enjoyment is quite another thing.  I suppose both could be seen as guilty of some offence (although there would be jurisdictional issues there as well)


Anyway, not all bootlegging activity is the same.  I know a case could probably be made to say that no one should ever download or otherwise obtain an LZ boot.  But I just can't see a problem with a devoted fan wanting to hear them live back in their prime.

 

I actually talked with Page once, and mentioned the fact that I listen to live Zep shows all the time and how much I enjoyed hearing how their performances varied and all the improvisation that went on , etc. I thought he might glare at me and walk away but he said he enjoyed hearing them as well and said he had " acquired quite a nice collection". I then told him about how I saw a rather funny signed photo of him in a bootleg shop in Shinjuku with the owner. He laughed and said " you saw that!!??" So, it's definitely a complicated subject.  That being said,  I don't consider trading live shows bootlegging, even though it may breach legal distinctions. Bootlegging is the sale of unofficial product. Stealing a tape from the owner and sharing it freely is obviously very wrong, but selling it is really objectional and opportunistic. Sharing of personally made tapes shouldn't much worry an artist worth millions of $ ....other than to be embarrassed about their performance. Selling a tapers personally shared recordings that were downloaded and pressed to vinyl or cd is really objectionable. That's total opportunism.

 

Edited by porgie66

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree, trading, as opposed to selling, should be seen differently.  

We now live in an era where everyone has free and easy access to all this stuff.  They want it, they see it, they can have a copy in minutes (if not less time).  Its very hard to say to fans of a band that they love that they must NOT listen to or download their favourite band's awesome live shows from the 1970s.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now