Login to Account Create an Account
pink floyd
#21
Posted 22 November 2008 - 03:30 PM
Overrated, or what?...I don't think so.
RB
#22
Posted 22 November 2008 - 04:28 PM
Pink Floyd must have being doing something right during their career, as it is reported that they sold over 210 million albums worldwide, whilst The Dark Side Of The Moon achieved a total of 1,500 weeks (over 28 years) on the Billboard and Pop Catalogue charts.
Overrated, or what?...I don't think so.
RB
maybe they used clever marketing techniques
cant be because of their music
#23
Posted 22 November 2008 - 04:37 PM
maybe they used clever marketing techniques
How do you mean "clever"?
As to musicians making mistakes in live performance, that's the way it is. It's called being human.
RB
#24
Posted 22 November 2008 - 04:54 PM
*pink floyd in the album chart for 10 years*
hey they must be good lets go buy it.
they also used one of the cheapest tricks in the book - lyrics containing profanity.
it's an early version of what gangster rappers do today.
all impressionable kids love a bit of rebellion .
*bus stop rat bag - you fucked up old hag*
laughable lyrics and a cheap marketing ploy - but hat's off to them
it worked wonders
#25
Posted 22 November 2008 - 05:18 PM
people get sucked in by the media's presentation of things
*pink floyd in the album chart for 10 years*
hey they must be good lets go buy it.
they also used one of the cheapest tricks in the book - lyrics containing profanity.
it's an early version of what gangster rappers do today.
all impressionable kids love a bit of rebellion .
*bus stop rat bag - you fucked up old hag*
laughable lyrics and a cheap marketing ploy - but hat's off to them
it worked wonders
You don't 'alf come out with some right shite, La.........................
#26
Posted 22 November 2008 - 05:20 PM
You don't 'alf come out with some right shite, La.........................
i'm glad you like it
#27
Posted 22 November 2008 - 05:29 PM
david gilmour used to play most of the bass on their albums
care to back that up?
I don't think you even bothered reading my post. Where did you see anything about Nick Mason?re your second point - i simply fell out of love with them and now cant see what i ever liked about their stuff in the first place
also - nick mason is a terrible drummer imo - one of the worst ever to be recorded
i mean he even messed up the money intro at live 8
So you can't see why you ever liked them. I can, very clearly, because I keep coming back to their music after having had "affairs" with other artists, because to me their music is truly timeless. Imagine that.
#28
Posted 22 November 2008 - 05:34 PM
#29
Posted 22 November 2008 - 05:35 PM
care to back that up?
I don't think you even bothered reading my post. Where did you see anything about Nick Mason?
So you can't see why you ever liked them. I can, very clearly, because I keep coming back to their music after having had "affairs" with other artists, because to me their music is truly timeless. Imagine that.
accept my apologies re the nick mason stuff
i got your post mixed up with someone else's
with reference to gilmour playing bass - it is widely accepted that this is the case.
in fact waters himself has admitted this in numerous interviews
#30
Posted 22 November 2008 - 05:37 PM
people get sucked in by the media's presentation of things
*pink floyd in the album chart for 10 years*
hey they must be good lets go buy it.
they also used one of the cheapest tricks in the book - lyrics containing profanity.
it's an early version of what gangster rappers do today.
all impressionable kids love a bit of rebellion .
*bus stop rat bag - you fucked up old hag*
laughable lyrics and a cheap marketing ploy - but hat's off to them
it worked wonders
I was a Floyd fan before I even knew the internet existed. And I didn't start paying paying attention to what the media said about until many years later. I simply liked their music.
Nice try, but your broad generalizations don't really fly.
#31
Posted 22 November 2008 - 05:47 PM
I was a Floyd fan before I even knew the internet existed. And I didn't start paying paying attention to what the media said about until many years later. I simply liked their music.
Nice try, but your broad generalizations don't really fly.
i agree generalizations dont work - but generally speaking i find their music to be too rehearsed
thank heaven for sound effects and lightshows
#32
Posted 22 November 2008 - 07:34 PM
that's fair enough
to be honest i will be surprised if you can name a song that shows how fantastic he was????
How about the entire album "Meddle"? The drum dynamics on that album fit beautifully with the rest of the music, which is part of the reason that is my favourite Pink Floyd album.
Speed is only a part of good drumming technique, Nick had a great sense of dynamics (soft and heavy), at least on the older albums.
Even if he did lose it as he got older, that doesn't take away from the fact that he was good on those older albums.
Edited by Jarlaxle 56, 22 November 2008 - 07:35 PM.
#33
Posted 22 November 2008 - 07:41 PM
#34
Posted 22 November 2008 - 07:43 PM
with reference to gilmour playing bass - it is widely accepted that this is the case.
in fact waters himself has admitted this in numerous interviews
I've never heard Waters confirm that. I know its true based on album sleeve notes and David being very candidate about recording sessions.
i agree generalizations dont work - but generally speaking i find their music to be too rehearsed
thank heaven for sound effects and lightshows
To that, I'll agree. Pink Floyd, before they brought in numerous backing musicians and vocalists, were a subpar live act..at best.
Again, you have your opinion. That's fine. But your way off with their success being largely due to marketing. Good music doesn't need good marketing. The music speaks for itself. And in the case of Pink Floyd, their musical is timeless. And that speaks louder than any marketing scheme.
#35
Posted 22 November 2008 - 07:56 PM
this might make me v unpopular
![]()
does anyone else, other than me, think pink floyd are probably the most overrated band in the world?
listening to their albums from 68 through to the final cut (i dont count the ones without roger waters as they are completely dire) it strikes me there are only 3 good ones out of the whole bunch.
their early ones are just a lot of un-melodic noise and the later ones (the wall side 4 on vinyl and the final cut) just a weak attempt at some kind of brass band opera style pomp.
dark side of the moon is good BUT not that good, wish you were here and the first 3 sides of the wall are probably the only good stuff they ever released.
it amazes me how they are consistently put up there with Zeppelin as one of the greatest bands in history.
just listening to their drummer is enough to put you off
anyone got any thoughts on this?
Have to dissagree to some extent as I think the Rolling Stones are the most overrated band. Floyd with Barret was very inovative..broke new groud, then he went, give them their due , songs like Echoes and DSOTM also was very groundbreaking, so for that alone they deserve alot of credit. Their use of space in the music giving it time to breath , build up was a great thing in some of their music, in a day and age where people feel they have to cram every millisecond with a note or notes just in case thay have to actually feel the music and time..they still can still do it for me every now and then.
Edited by leddy, 22 November 2008 - 07:58 PM.
#36
Posted 22 November 2008 - 08:03 PM
Wow, that was just brilliant. Exactly how I feel about Pink Floyd.Their use of space in the music giving it time to breath , build up was a great thing in some of their music, in a day and age where people feel they have to cram every millisecond with a note or notes just in case thay have to actually feel the music and time..
#37
Posted 22 November 2008 - 08:07 PM
But that's a topic for another thread.
#38
Posted 22 November 2008 - 08:29 PM
Edited by JethroTull, 22 November 2008 - 08:30 PM.
#39
Posted 22 November 2008 - 11:02 PM
maybe they used clever marketing techniques
cant be because of their music
Had nothing to do with marketing and everything to do with the fact millions of people think the album is amazing.
#40
Posted 22 November 2008 - 11:56 PM

Sign In
Create Account






Back to top









