Jump to content
Slate Blackcurrant Watermelon Strawberry Orange Banana Apple Emerald Chocolate Marble
Slate Blackcurrant Watermelon Strawberry Orange Banana Apple Emerald Chocolate Marble

Recommended Posts

30 minutes ago, Realperson said:

https://www.newyorker.com/culture/cultural-comment/the-unoriginal-originality-of-led-zeppelin

There's definitely been some bad rulings due to the broad, vague and confusing nature of the copyright laws as they pertain to music....LZ I think has a better case than Blurred Lines, for example...

This was a very good article written around the time of the first jury....

 

Yeah, I enjoy Alex Ross' contributions in the New Yorker and remember reading this piece. A good one to cut+paste for your friends who complain about Led Zeppelin being thieves.

I wonder if all these lawsuits are another bugaboo in the possibility of Robert and Jimmy and Jones playing together? I think it irks Robert Plant to the point that he doesn't want to talk about it. And a major way to make sure he doesn't have to talk about it is to not play with Jimmy and Jonesy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Realperson said:

 

This Beato guy is great. Love his videos. Put him on the Zep defense team!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
30 minutes ago, Strider said:

This Beato guy is great. Love his videos. Put him on the Zep defense team!

Agree. Then, hopefully everyone can get on with more important things.

R😎👍

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Randy California is spinning in his grave. He knew the score...that's why he didn't bother with a lawsuit. These bozos besmirching Randy's name today will just keep appealing and appealing until they find a dopey jury that buys their bullshit.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, Strider said:

Randy California is spinning in his grave. He knew the score...that's why he didn't bother with a lawsuit. These bozos besmirching Randy's name today will just keep appealing and appealing until they find a dopey jury that buys their bullshit.

It's well known that Randy California didn't pursue the lawsuit because of the legal cost. He wasn't sitting on a pile of money like Zeppelin and company.  Randy California stated in a number of interviews that he was well aware that the song was borrowed from Taurus. That's the reason that he's spinning in his grave over this.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
On 9/29/2018 at 5:18 AM, Strider said:

Such a bogus decision...and just in time to cast a pall over the 50th anniversary.  Most media outlets will take the lazy angle that Led Zeppelin stole all of their songs, reinforced by all the bullshit on the internet by people with an axe to grind.

Now everyone has to be dragged back to court and time and money wasted. The first jury was able to render the correct verdict. Given the decline in intelligence and musical intelligence in particular in the jury pool, the odds of getting a good jury two times in a row are slim.

The fact that Led Zeppelin's music has to be judged by a bunch of peons is about as ridiculous as the Senate sitting in judgement over Kavanaugh's sex life. We all know Senate and House Pages are some of the most sexually harrassed people on the planet.

You sound like someone with an axe to grind. So let us hear it...what is your take on the subject?

Being a fan of the band's music doesn't mean that I have to feel some sense of blind devotion towards the band. And that's about as much as I'm going to say about the situation.

Edited by mysticman560

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 hours ago, mysticman560 said:

It's well known that Randy California didn't pursue the lawsuit because of the legal cost. He wasn't sitting on a pile of money like Zeppelin and company.  Randy California stated in a number of interviews that he was well aware that the song was borrowed from Taurus. That's the reason that he's spinning in his grave over this.

Any lawyer who felt the lawsuit had merit would have gladly taken the case pro bono just for the free publicity and higher profile the lawyer would receive...which would in turn boost his practice. I'm not buying the poor-house excuse.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 hours ago, mysticman560 said:

Being a fan of the band's music doesn't mean that I have to feel some sense of blind devotion towards the band. And that's about as much as I'm going to say about the situation.

I don't have blind devotion. I have mentioned the times I felt the band should have credited others. But just because they were neglectful on a few doesn't taint all of their songs. 

If you had read Alex Ross' article or watched Beato's video, you would understand the slippery-slope to doom that a judgement against Led Zeppelin in this case would create. Creativity is never clear-cut black-and-white. Picasso, Shakespeare, Bach. If we were to apply today's litigious standards to the past, no one would be able to escape being labelled a plagiarist...not even God.

So if you've got something of musical or legal value to say in defense of Spirit receiving credit for "Stairway to Heaven", by all means enlighten us. Don't hide behind some "fanboy" excuse.

Otherwise I will have to assume that you have nothing of real substance to say. You're just one of those "Led Zeppelin are thieves" people with no ability to parse the real from the fake.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I personally think Jimmy Page should sue the hundreds of band that have ripped off his riffs. What goes around, comes around. This lawsuit is bullshit. I could name (at the very least) two hundred songs off the top of my head that have been nicked by various groups over the last 40 years, and if you ask me to, I will.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 hours ago, Strider said:

I don't have blind devotion. I have mentioned the times I felt the band should have credited others. But just because they were neglectful on a few doesn't taint all of their songs. 

If you had read Alex Ross' article or watched Beato's video, you would understand the slippery-slope to doom that a judgement against Led Zeppelin in this case would create. Creativity is never clear-cut black-and-white. Picasso, Shakespeare, Bach. If we were to apply today's litigious standards to the past, no one would be able to escape being labelled a plagiarist...not even God.

So if you've got something of musical or legal value to say in defense of Spirit receiving credit for "Stairway to Heaven", by all means enlighten us. Don't hide behind some "fanboy" excuse.

Otherwise I will have to assume that you have nothing of real substance to say. You're just one of those "Led Zeppelin are thieves" people with no ability to parse the real from the fake.

Spot on.

I've always felt Spirit's case was weak, but I confess I've had some ambivalence - I've sort of felt 75-25 in favor of Zeppelin. But after watching Beato's video, my ambivalence is gone. Others did somewhat similar videos when the case first went to trial, but Beato's is by far the most concise, the clearest, and has the most evidence packed into it. In fact, Zep should just call him as an expert witness and be done with it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
56 minutes ago, tmtomh said:

Spot on.

I've always felt Spirit's case was weak, but I confess I've had some ambivalence - I've sort of felt 75-25 in favor of Zeppelin. But after watching Beato's video, my ambivalence is gone. Others did somewhat similar videos when the case first went to trial, but Beato's is by far the most concise, the clearest, and has the most evidence packed into it. In fact, Zep should just call him as an expert witness and be done with it.

Beatbo doesn't even get to the disputed section of Taurus, he stops the track as it get's to the acoustic guitar part.

Another thing there is NOT ONE genuine vesion of Taurus on YouTube, they are all fake, they have all been edited to remove the acoustic guitar section that is disputed and some other unrelated guitar part edited in I can't find one that matches the version I have.. I am going to repeat myself, I first heard Taurus over forty years ago and I have always thought that  Taurus and STH shared some SIMILARITES, they are NOT the SAME . 

Edited by JTM

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

Just to look at things from a different angle (and to stay away from the deceased equine), what if someone played Taurus but added the ascending treble notes (ala Stairway)? Would Zep be able to sue them or could they say "The riff goes back for ages!"?

 

Edited by gibsonfan159

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, tmtomh said:

Spot on.

I've always felt Spirit's case was weak, but I confess I've had some ambivalence - I've sort of felt 75-25 in favor of Zeppelin. But after watching Beato's video, my ambivalence is gone. Others did somewhat similar videos when the case first went to trial, but Beato's is by far the most concise, the clearest, and has the most evidence packed into it. In fact, Zep should just call him as an expert witness and be done with it.

 I saw Rick Emmitt's video before Beato's and I have to say (don't know which vid was created first) but I felt he said the same exact thing, played the same exact songs only better. :blahblah:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, gibsonfan159 said:

Just to look at things from a different angle (and to stay away from the deceased equine), what if someone played Taurus but added the ascending treble notes (ala Stairway)? Would Zep be able to sue them or could they say "The riff goes back for ages!"?

 

*Crickets*

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
10 hours ago, JTM said:

Beatbo doesn't even get to the disputed section of Taurus, he stops the track as it get's to the acoustic guitar part.

Another thing there is NOT ONE genuine vesion of Taurus on YouTube, they are all fake, they have all been edited to remove the acoustic guitar section that is disputed and some other unrelated guitar part edited in I can't find one that matches the version I have.. I am going to repeat myself, I first heard Taurus over forty years ago and I have always thought that  Taurus and STH shared some SIMILARITES, they are NOT the SAME . 

Maybe they are blocked in your country for I had no problem finding several authentic "Taurus" videos.

 

 

 

Edited by Strider

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, gibsonfan159 said:

*Crickets*

The answer is an extremely obvious yes, that is, Zeppelin would not have sued. My basis for this conclusion is that Dolly Parton wrote a song in 1974 (released in 75') called We Used To which reached #9 on the Country charts. The first 10 seconds are a virtual match to the beginning of STH and the arrangement of the song, including the pacing of the lyrics, is the same. Did Zeppelin sue Parton for this obvious lift. Nope. It was actually a pretty huge deal in 75' when Parton released the song and both Page & Plant were asked what they thought, Plant's response, " We love Dolly Parton, it's a great song."

Next

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, IpMan said:

The answer is an extremely obvious yes, that is, Zeppelin would not have sued. My basis for this conclusion is that Dolly Parton wrote a song in 1974 (released in 75') called We Used To which reached #9 on the Country charts. The first 10 seconds are a virtual match to the beginning of STH and the arrangement of the song, including the pacing of the lyrics, is the same. Did Zeppelin sue Parton for this obvious lift. Nope. It was actually a pretty huge deal in 75' when Parton released the song and both Page & Plant were asked what they thought, Plant's response, " We love Dolly Parton, it's a great song."

Next

Wow, I never heard this tune before...the intro is basically the same arpeggio walk down. Much more literal than the Stairway/ Taurus comparison. 

Maybe the Spirit legal team will go after Dolly too! 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
17 hours ago, Strider said:

Maybe they are blocked in your country for I had no problem finding several authentic "Taurus" videos.

 

 

 

My mistake, all those videos are real, lesson to oneself, don't rely on crappy laptop speakers, think I'll get me coat......

Edited by JTM

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

They'll be going after Mary Poppins next,,,, didnt JPJ mention that this was closer than Spirit....

 

Edited by Victor

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On ‎10‎/‎3‎/‎2018 at 1:14 AM, porgie66 said:

Wow, I never heard this tune before...the intro is basically the same arpeggio walk down. Much more literal than the Stairway/ Taurus comparison. 

Maybe the Spirit legal team will go after Dolly too! 

Are they claiming Dolly Parton wrote her song after hearing Taurus?  If not, these comparisons are irrelevant.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, JohnOsbourne said:

Are they claiming Dolly Parton wrote her song after hearing Taurus?  If not, these comparisons are irrelevant.

It was in response to my question, on whether or not Zep could sue for someone copying the Stairway riff verbatim.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, gibsonfan159 said:

It was in response to my question, on whether or not Zep could sue for someone copying the Stairway riff verbatim. 

It's a question of how far you can go, isn't it. I'm fine with Stairway, and think the Taurus suit is nonsense. But then Jimmy didn't write the Stairway riff either, and nor did this guy!

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×