Jump to content

zafreth

Members
  • Posts

    95
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by zafreth

  1. I read the document, my opinion from the legal point of view, is that the infrigement of copyright, will make no mood to judge that they are equal according to Randy's attorney, also no evidence from the point of view musical or make a direct comparison of notes and arpeggios, dedicated only to say they are equal with subjective arguments, devoid of any probative value.

    also talks as if the whole song are of the copyright infrigement, when only it comes to chords, arpeggios which are public domain BTW.

    from an advertising point of view, it is a masterstroke to LZ, as in the popular imagination will stay that Zepp "stole" the initial part of Taurus, although the plaintiff itself is inappropriate and void
    .

    i insist, if the attorney do not demostrate to the jury from a musical point of view, that "Taurus" and "STW" are similar, the plaintiff is going to be dissmised.

  2. This is very cheesy...

    More than the STH lawsuit but that's a close second.

    I respect the late Randy California a great deal. He died a hero. But his name does not deserve to be listed in the credits...

    There are many other artists that deserve credit from Led Zeppelin but Randy California and especially Mark Andes are not among them..

    Exactly and furthermore, Why Randy did not sued LZ in 1971?? why they (Spirit) and Randy did not sued in 1993 with the Marino remasters? why they wait until 2014 and the rerelease of the album? the answer is MONEY nothing more and nothing less, shame on you Mark Andes and Co.!!!

×
×
  • Create New...