Jump to content

LedZep342

Members
  • Posts

    1,205
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by LedZep342

  1. I noticed in this photo from June 29, 1969 (first show) an object that had features of the same as a camera, I know some shows were filmed at the RAH throughout this time period. I was wondering if anyone here could confirm what this object is (boxed in red)?

    zepax4.jpg1158.jpg

  2. The Monkees were always just another band I knew, I wasn't ever to fasinated with their work. Sure I've listened to a few of their tunes ("I'm a beleiver" comes to mind). But when I heard about Davey's death this morning, I was shocked, I had no idea his life would end so soon.

    R.I.P. Davey Jones

  3. I agree with 342, they look like they were scanned from a book or something.

    So now you agree with me, way to go by saying "no shit sherlock".

    Another question is why do three of the photos contain a watermark? Is this from the Bonham archives, did a member of the Bonham family possibly take these photos?

    Captain Crunge, could you please provide a link to the site where you found these photos?

  4. Interesting footage of several bands.....Would be a nice revelation if ever cleaned up for a release

    It was shot using poor equipment planning, Zeppelin's set was shot with one 16mm camera, as were other bands. I don't know why they intended to make this into a documentary, poor film set-up inter cut with a bunch of audience scenes and/or footage of the band that isn't even synchronized isn't going to make a very good documentary, this is why they haven't made a release of the festival on DVD. Audio is another story, an audio release would be great, as there are I believe complete soundboards of every band.

  5. Robert's second mic was because they were multitracking the RAH 70 show. It had nothing to do with the video. For one thing, it was 16mm film not video, and there were no video screens used for 70 RAH, so no need for a video feed.

    And if I remember correctly, all the 16mm film shot at 70 RAH was silent, meaning they had to synch the multitrack audio to the film for the DVD.

    And for the last time, I don't know why this is so hard for some people to understand, there was NO VIDEO SCREEN at the LA Forum...not in 75, not in 77, not ever! Any film you see from a LA Forum gig is going to be fan-shot.

    By 1975, the band obviously relaxed their security, as there's a ton of 1975 and 77 8mm fan footage compared to earlier years.

    No, there was original sound, in the DVD booklet it is said that the audio was synched completely by hand, or maybe that was The Concert File ( either way, I personally think this is a complete exaggeration, as there was original sound).

  6. Legit:

    If any of this alleged footage existed, wouldn't it have surfaced by now, through bootleg???

    Come on people, speculation is exciting and fun, and yeah i would love to see something pro or audience, in full, surface someday.

    Alas, woudn't it have happend by now?? Yes it would have.

    No, there's copyrights, and Jimmy would might like to use it for future release.

  7. Here is what the site said:

    There is a company in L.A. who has six hours of colour film of Bath, including 30 mins of Led Zeppelin and about a year ago they tried to sell it to Jimmy Page,but they were asking too much for it and he refused to buy it.

    Six hours of COLOR film, this is b/w film that was given to the band (Page): Professionally filmed 16mm footage of Zeppelin at Bath was given to the band in the last year or two. Unfortunately it was just silent footage .

×
×
  • Create New...