Imagine calling a bar band, a band that has played with orchestras, and playing at special events, I don't understand the unjustified hatred of the band.

Another who is like me.

That is actually subjective, not an absolute truth, it may not seem the same to another person.

Excellent fact, let me write it down in the things that I don't give a damn about.

The name is so fitting to that amazing riff. And I love organ distortion.

In that live the organ is full of distortion.

Do you have a stroke? That purple concert is one of the most epic I've ever seen, and I didn't even know there were those palmers blah blah at the jam. It could even be more epic with the mk II formation. My God what fanaticism achieves.

What a hilarious reason xd. Now the most logical and analytical reason I have is that not all bands have the same success. Yes, Zeppelin is very good, but what I mean is that purple didn't get much fame. As a listener to a lot of their work they have really good songs. They just weren't that successful, talent doesn't always make you famous. Just because he's not famous doesn't mean there's something wrong with him.

In my opinion, this is their best cover design.

I think Zep has better songs than Purple, and Purple has better songs than Zep, depends on what song. Although if Zep is a few steps higher.

I am a Purpulian, but I know that Zeppelin was better, because without them there would be no Purple's formation 2. There is just one or two wrong opinions here.

Well anyway they put the cover to the song.

Black night is already in the album In rock? It's that in the cd edition they put it with the other songs.

I don't think so at all, glover hardly did any bass solos or anything like that, and paice just followed the song. My reasons could be. A little bit of people's taste, it influences, their strongest lineup broke up, marketing.

That's right, I found this funny montage.

Well, in my opinion Mahine Head and In rock are the best, Fireball is a good appetizer. The bad thing about fireball is that they don't put demons' eye and strange kind of woman in the same album.

That is only your subjective opinion, it does not have to be definitive.

I don't think you've seen the Child in Time live on Granada TV. Zeppelin is bigger, but Purple's musicians were very good. Besides, the strongest line-up broke up. I think that lowering purple to that degree is something wrong, although there were bad formations like MK V.

It is a fact that Zeppelin was more influential than Purple. I honestly stick with both bands. But I see a lot of people give wrong reasons why this happens, like they were bad musicians or because of the "keyboards", those reasons in my opinion are not good reasons. They had a break nowadays. child in time on their official channel has almost 100 M views. Watching this kind of debates I sincerely find many things wrong and some things true, even Gillan himself commented regarding the major success of ZP and BS. "It doesn't irritate me at all. I'm happy that there are people who liked us then, enough to create this mystical, long-lived air, and also that there are people who like us now. You can't do something for 50 years unless you've done it right."

That in my opinion is subjective, the copenhagen live is very good. The live performance of child in time has blow the heads of many who react here on youtube.

Exactly, that's what I'm saying.

I had read this before, but they compare the two bands.

You know that Lord connected his organ to a Marshall amp, making it more rocker. Here they recreate something similar.

What did the members think about deep purple? I read them