Squeeze My Lemons Posted March 27, 2009 Share Posted March 27, 2009 Why was this video edited. It has still and slow-motion moments like the ones in the DVD. Was this intended to be released? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kdh Posted March 27, 2009 Share Posted March 27, 2009 something to do with the footage portions not being of proper value for release, i.e shooting at the floor, closeup of something not deemed to match what the band is trying to get across in musical terms, there not being any footage shot for that musical moment, etc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moonmaid Posted March 27, 2009 Share Posted March 27, 2009 It's a great performance, but the filming is terrible. During Jimmy's solos the camera shot is deep in Robert's hair. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sibh23 Posted March 27, 2009 Share Posted March 27, 2009 It's a great performance, but the filming is terrible. During Jimmy's solos the camera shot is deep in Robert's hair. It had more to do with the editing, and I liked that segment because of the intensity. This was circulating on the RAH pro-shot vintage edit. A 60 (?) minute fragment of video from the RAH which was intended to be used on the documentary project. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SuperDave Posted March 30, 2009 Share Posted March 30, 2009 Is this the version that mixes proshot footage with bootleg? The first 3 minutes are good than goes to bootleg and finally back again if I'm right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.