robi1138 Posted May 19, 2009 Share Posted May 19, 2009 Is there a version of Destroyer that doesn't have the cuts in TSRTS and (especially) No Quarter? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tom kid Posted May 19, 2009 Share Posted May 19, 2009 Not that I know of. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZepFanatic Posted May 19, 2009 Share Posted May 19, 2009 No, unfortunately there is not... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robi1138 Posted May 19, 2009 Author Share Posted May 19, 2009 That's what I thought What a shame, too. Incredible version of No Quarter...possibly my favorite. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kashmiran Posted May 20, 2009 Share Posted May 20, 2009 (edited) The following comment will make me sound EXTREMELY dense, so forgive me for that. A- Where is the cut in NQ? B- If there is only one version, how do we know there is a cut? Edited May 20, 2009 by kashmiran Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rock Action Posted May 20, 2009 Share Posted May 20, 2009 The entire piano/boogie section is cut out, save for a tiny bit at the end. If they had to cut it, at least that was the best part to cut. They could have edited it much better though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sibh23 Posted May 21, 2009 Share Posted May 21, 2009 The following comment will make me sound EXTREMELY dense, so forgive me for that. A- Where is the cut in NQ? B- If there is only one version, how do we know there is a cut? Perfect. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NickZepp Posted May 23, 2009 Share Posted May 23, 2009 I like the 4-28 aud performance much better than the 27th. The band seemed a little off on the 27th to me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ListenToThis Posted October 7, 2014 Share Posted October 7, 2014 Be on the lookout for a new version of this classic boot, in this case titled "The Destroyer" (which used to signify 1977/04/28 but in this case means 1977/04/27). Said to feature much improved sound (I'm not sure how it could get much better) it perhaps may feature more tape and less gaps (don't anyone hold their breath yet though). There will be three versions with different covers released on the old Tarantu... label, so for the hardcore collectors this will be a pain in the butt. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sue Dounim Posted October 7, 2014 Share Posted October 7, 2014 It's a shame that either an audience tape or the regular cassette soundboard of this show hasn't ever shown up to fill the cuts. Also I don't trust anything Tarantura does, so I'm not holding my breath. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nutrocker Posted October 8, 2014 Share Posted October 8, 2014 Hell, at this point I'll settle for the alternate, more complete audience tape for the April 28 show to come into common circulation, instead of just being in the hands of a few 'elite collectors'... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sue Dounim Posted October 8, 2014 Share Posted October 8, 2014 I didn't even know there was a second tape of 4/28. Sure would like a better source for Pontiac though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strider Posted October 8, 2014 Share Posted October 8, 2014 Be on the lookout for a new version of this classic boot, in this case titled "The Destroyer" (which used to signify 1977/04/28 but in this case means 1977/04/27). Said to feature much improved sound (I'm not sure how it could get much better) it perhaps may feature more tape and less gaps (don't anyone hold their breath yet though). There will be three versions with different covers released on the old Tarantu... label, so for the hardcore collectors this will be a pain in the butt. As far as I know, "Destroyer" has always been used to signify the April 27, 1977 show. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ListenToThis Posted October 8, 2014 Share Posted October 8, 2014 1977/04/27 was titled "Destroyer" 1977/04/28 was titled "The Destroyer" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strider Posted October 8, 2014 Share Posted October 8, 2014 1977/04/27 was titled "Destroyer" 1977/04/28 was titled "The Destroyer" I see now...I overlooked the 'The'. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ListenToThis Posted October 8, 2014 Share Posted October 8, 2014 I agree it's silly, but for a time that's how they were differentiated Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lcondo123 Posted October 8, 2014 Share Posted October 8, 2014 I read somewhere before that there were two sources from 4/28 too, the review said that the one not in circulation is a better sounding version (go figure) and the common one is not as good. I'll try to find where I got that from Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lcondo123 Posted October 9, 2014 Share Posted October 9, 2014 I read somewhere before that there were two sources from 4/28 too, the review said that the one not in circulation is a better sounding version (go figure) and the common one is not as good. I'll try to find where I got that from UPDATE: I can't locate where I found that. It was a website that archived all of the sources for each show and I cannot find where I read that... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crinkleman123 Posted October 9, 2014 Share Posted October 9, 2014 UPDATE: I can't locate where I found that. It was a website that archived all of the sources for each show and I cannot find where I read that... Is it this? http://starship.jpn.ph/zeppelin/beauty/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lcondo123 Posted October 10, 2014 Share Posted October 10, 2014 Is it this? http://starship.jpn.ph/zeppelin/beauty/ No, it was just a written archive with reviews and different documentation for each source and each boot release. I remember it being under the helm of one or two guys that did all of the archiving themselves, no actual audio. Although that website is helpful, it doesn't have any written reviews for the different tape sources and all of the documented boots like that one website I was thinking of. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nutrocker Posted October 10, 2014 Share Posted October 10, 2014 ...And besides which, the Black Beauty site only lists the myriad of different boots for the common "Oh Fuck!" April 28 source. The only sites I've read actual confirmation of the second source are Argenteum Astrum's site (and he isn't exactly the most trustworthy collector in the Zeppelin trading community) and over at Steve Hoffman's site which is where I recall first hearing of the second April 28 source in the first place... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lcondo123 Posted October 11, 2014 Share Posted October 11, 2014 ...And besides which, the Black Beauty site only lists the myriad of different boots for the common "Oh Fuck!" April 28 source. The only sites I've read actual confirmation of the second source are Argenteum Astrum's site (and he isn't exactly the most trustworthy collector in the Zeppelin trading community) and over at Steve Hoffman's site which is where I recall first hearing of the second April 28 source in the first place... That's the site! Yes, thank you for mentioning that, Nutrocker. Where did he get that the second source was taped "on platform usually used for television camera for sports broadcasts"? Has he had access to that second source? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nutrocker Posted October 11, 2014 Share Posted October 11, 2014 That's the site! Yes, thank you for mentioning that, Nutrocker. Where did he get that the second source was taped "on platform usually used for television camera for sports broadcasts"? Has he had access to that second source? I would assume he has had access to it, but it doesn't change the fact that he's still a slimy fucker in cahoots with bootleggers, likes to blab (AA is one of the people responsible for why we don't have Freezer's Baton Rouge '77 recording in circulation) and generally is one of those people who gives Zeppelin collectors a bad name... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lcondo123 Posted October 11, 2014 Share Posted October 11, 2014 I would assume he has had access to it, but it doesn't change the fact that he's still a slimy fucker in cahoots with bootleggers, likes to blab (AA is one of the people responsible for why we don't have Freezer's Baton Rouge '77 recording in circulation) and generally is one of those people who gives Zeppelin collectors a bad name... Oh brother, this guy. I read what you wrote about what happened to Freezer on that other thread and that is just downright WRONG. I getcha why this guy would be hard to believe, he is one very slimy fucker... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zepster1979 Posted October 12, 2014 Share Posted October 12, 2014 (edited) In fact it's not true. That guy (AA) indeed is a strange person. However, I spoke to few others around and it seems that someone else from the behind is responsible for that weird situation. The Baton Rouge 77 for almost sure haven't been trading to anyone coz I know someone who has access to, literally speaking, everything that is in circulation, along with sources that haven't been in general trading. I asked him if he knows something about Baton Rouge tape and he said he could trade everything of what he got to get a copy of that tape. So, I cannot confirm this for sure but I strongly believe that we'll never hear this show. Edited October 12, 2014 by zepster1979 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.