This what happens when you give the public the power to create DVD's

[BonzoLikeDrumer]

This is what happens when you give the public the power to create DVD's. It's just not right. but I don't know if it was intentional or not but, should it even be allowed if it's going to our kid's?

http://news.aol.com/article/calif-students...rsion-of/555123

[Jarlaxle 56]

This is news?

[jabe]

This is news?

If the six seconds of sex on her couch clip involved one of her students, well...

[Rock Action]

Film at 11, eh?

[BonzoLikeDrumer]

This is news?

No not really ... This is some thing that should have never happened dude! Amateur's thinking that they have it all fingered out. And maybe you don't have a problem with it (that's cool with me) but some 6 year old's parent's may have a big problem with it, no matter who was in the video! These movie's are going to the impressionable young mind's of the future of our public!

I could see if it was a privet school that was in a sex filled society and all the parent's sent there kid's there because that school is open about any thing. But this was in a public school that is suppose to be teaching our kid's.

And then there is the law saying that you have to be 21 years old to even have this type of stuff.

[I have got a horsey]

Let's hope it ends up on redtube soon...

[Katuschka]

This is what happens when you give the public the power to create DVD's. It's just not right. but I don't know if it was intentional or not but, should it even be allowed if it's going to our kid's?

http://news.aol.com/article/calif-students...rsion-of/555123

And you propose what? Banning home videos?

No, it shouldn't be tolerated; however, you make it sound as if the teacher were forcing her pupils to watch her home-made porn, which is obviously nor the case. She just made a mistake and apparently tried to correct it immediately. This pales in comparison with what can be found on countless of easily accessible porn sites. THAT is not right. I assure you that seeing a 6secs long video of someone having sex on a couch will not corrupt a child; saying that it's something dirty that he or she shouldn't have seen certainly will.

[BonzoLikeDrumer]

And you propose what? Banning home videos?

No, it shouldn't be tolerated; however, you make it sound as if the teacher were forcing her pupils to watch her home-made porn, which is obviously nor the case. She just made a mistake and apparently tried to correct it immediately. This pales in comparison with what can be found on countless of easily accessible porn sites. THAT is not right. I assure you that seeing a 6secs long video of someone having sex on a couch will not corrupt a child; saying that it's something dirty that he or she shouldn't have seen certainly will.

I don't think you get my point. If it had been a reputable video company it would have never happened. And I also don't think that a Voyeur should be teaching in the public school system ether.

I'm worried about why this has been kept so quiet, is this woman some kind of pron star (pro or part time)? Or has she been a part of some after school sex club on the side? Or even worse, a prostitute?

[Katuschka]

I don't think you get my point. If it had been a reputable video company it would have never happened. And I also don't think that a Voyeur should be teaching in the public school system ether.

Well, alright. I get your point. Only that something like that can happen even in a reputable video company. It shouldn't and it's not common, but even large television companies make blunders. The teacher surely didn't do it on purpose, and that's the point.

Voyeur? If I'm not mistaken, a voyeur is someone who watches other people.

I'm worried about why this has been kept so quiet, is this woman some kind of pron star (pro or part time)? Or has she been a part of some after school sex club on the side? Or even worse, a prostitute?

I really don't understand why you're so worried. It's probably because it's no big deal. If she were any of the above, I'm sure it would NOT be kept quiet. Moreover, it's quite improper to come up with such unwarranted judgements. I have made videos of myself and my man having sex countless of times, but I'm neither a voyeur, nor a porn star, prostitute or whatever.

What happens in the woman's bedroom is no one's business, as long as it's kept private, which is the only problem here. Sure, it was her professional failure, for which she should be punished. The sole fact that she made the video in the first place doesn't disqualify her as a teacher. An after school sex club? Don't be ridiculous. She just has a healthy sexual life. Or you never did it on a couch?

[BonzoLikeDrumer]

Well, alright. I get your point. Only that something like that can happen even in a reputable video company. It shouldn't and it's not common, but even large television companies make blunders. The teacher surely didn't do it on purpose, and that's the point.

Voyeur? If I'm not mistaken, a voyeur is someone who watches other people.

I really don't understand why you're so worried. It's probably because it's no big deal. If she were any of the above, I'm sure it would NOT be kept quiet. Moreover, it's quite improper to come up with such unwarranted judgements. I have made videos of myself and my man having sex countless of times, but I'm neither a voyeur, nor a porn star, prostitute or whatever.

What happens in the woman's bedroom is no one's business, as long as it's kept private, which is the only problem here. Sure, it was her professional failure, for which she should be punished. The sole fact that she made the video in the first place doesn't disqualify her as a teacher. An after school sex club? Don't be ridiculous. She just has a healthy sexual life. Or you never did it on a couch?

You still don't get it. You will never see Vivid producing a factual video documentary for the signing of the Declaration of Independence would you? And in the same context you would not see the National Geographic Channel making a hard core un-censored video on Larry Holme's meet's Jenna Jamison right? That's, what I was talking about! There is the right way, and the wrong way of doing thing's professionally.

If the kid's want a DVD of the school year let some one do it who know's what the heck there doing.

OK, what ever you think a person who like's to see them self on a video balling the night away will be fine with me.

Do you ever watch that video of you having sex? If so then by your own admitting you are a voyeur! But that is your prerogative and if you like it, ok fine. But this is not the correct behaver for some one teaching 5 and 6 year old's in our public school's.

My sexual life is not the question here because, I'm not a public school teacher.

[Katuschka]

You still don't get it. You will never see Vivid producing a factual video documentary for the signing of the Declaration of Independence would you? And in the same context you would not see the National Geographic Channel making a hard core un-censored video on Larry Holme's meet's Jenna Jamison right? That's, what I was talking about! There is the right way, and the wrong way of doing thing's professionally.

If the kid's want a DVD of the school year let some one do it who know's what the heck there doing.

No, you don't seem to get it. You have absolutely no idea why the DVD was made, and actually, it can be easily deduced from the article that if was the teacher's sole initiative. If it were the parents who came up with the idea, and paid for it, it would be whole lotta different. This way the teacher devoted her free time to making a cool video for her pupils. If she didn't make the stupid mistake, it would have been a nice gesture.

Do you ever watch that video of you having sex? If so then by your own admitting you are a voyeur! But that is your prerogative and if you like it, ok fine. But this is not the correct behaver for some one teaching 5 and 6 year old's in our public school's.

Yes. And I'm still watching myself, so you're painfully wrong. It's still part of my own privacy. It's the same as if the teacher had a mirror in her bedroom. If you think that there's something wrong with it, then we'll have to agree to disagree.

But let me tell you one thing; the only reason why we're discussing this is because the short spot mistakenly appeared on the DVD. If it didn't, you would have absolutely no idea what the woman is doing in private; and one of the fundamental reasons why you would have no idea is because it wouldn't affect her professional behaviour in any sense. You're very very naive if you think that other public school teachers spend their whole life practicing only the good old and boring missionary position. Still, it doesn't prevent them from being good teachers; and I really see no reason why it should. Quite on the contrary, in my opinion. I'm sure you would be surprised if you learned how "incorrectly" some of the people who you respect behave.

What's more, you basically called the woman a porn star or a prostitute in your subjective conclusions. That's a much greater offence than her making a private video of whatever she was doing. The teacher is guilty of being careless, but she BY NO MEANS deserves to be called such names. If she were already convicted of being a child molestor or whatever, I wouldn't say a word. Otherwise it was very much uncalled for.

My sexual life is not the question here because, I'm not a public school teacher.

Do you have children? Or are planning to have? If yes, then you are main tutor (because that's one of the principal roles of a parent), and therefore it IS relevant. It's actually even more relevant, because while children know their teachers only as professional tutors, parents are the "private" ones.

[TypeO]

And in the same context you would not see the National Geographic Channel making a hard core un-censored video on Larry Holme's meet's Jenna Jamison right?

that'd be a weird movie. (Larry Holmes was a boxer)

Of course, it'd be pretty weird with JOHN Holmes meets Jenna Jamison too, since he's been dead for about 20 years.

lulz - just goofin - I/we know what you meant, point you were making.

[The Rover]

This what happens when you give the public the power to create DVD's...

A documentary that promotes the fake idea of carbon-related causes of.... Global Warming ? ? ?

[BonzoLikeDrumer]

that'd be a weird movie. (Larry Holmes was a boxer)

Of course, it'd be pretty weird with JOHN Holmes meets Jenna Jamison too, since he's been dead for about 20 years.

lulz - just goofin - I/we know what you meant, point you were making.

Should have been John Holmes, my bad.