Jump to content

Led Zeppelin - Better Live or in Studio?


live or Studio?  

26 members have voted

  1. 1. Are Led Zeppelin better live or in Studio?

    • Studio
    • Live
    • Both
    • I don't like Led Zeppelin, and I don't know why I'm here
      0


Recommended Posts

Believe it or not, I prefer a live 35+ minute version of "Dazed and Confused" and "Moby Dick", etc.. over the extremely tremendous (less then 10 minute versions) of the same songs. I Love Led Zeppelin's live improvisation, versatility and risks that They risked with every concert that They ever played. Yes, some of that was rehearsed and contrived, but A LOT of it was Pure Genius and it took the Whole Band to pull of the Improv and Risks that made Led Zeppelin the Greatest Live Rock and Roll Group in the History of Rock and Roll.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...

There's a big difference in "Live", those being listening to them live (i.e. a live recording) and being their watching/listening to them play live.

The latter was the ultimate Zep experience. For those who managed to experience it, it was transcendent.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...