Jump to content
Slate Blackcurrant Watermelon Strawberry Orange Banana Apple Emerald Chocolate Marble
Slate Blackcurrant Watermelon Strawberry Orange Banana Apple Emerald Chocolate Marble
strombringer101

The change in Robert Plants singing.

Recommended Posts

I often wondered what Zeppelin fans thought back in 1975-to Present what they thought of the change in Robert plants vocals? I do recall reading that Zeppelin toured before the  physical graffiti album so I am pretty sure fans notice in concert that Plant lost range but what about those that 1. Didn’t see Zeppelins 75 tour but bought the album the same year. 2. Those that didn’t know the history of Zeppelin but discovered a change on the PG album? For me I found it kinda odd that  physical graffiti had recordings that sounded different compared to other songs on the Album. Houses of The Holy song is one example, or down by the sea side is another. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A buddy of mine said he and his friends saw Zep at MSG in 75, and they were all disappointed with Plant.  It was shocking to them when they opened with Rock n Roll and he sang a full octave lower than album cut.  I’m sure they weren’t alone in that sentiment.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
42 minutes ago, bluecongo said:

A buddy of mine said he and his friends saw Zep at MSG in 75, and they were all disappointed with Plant.  It was shocking to them when they opened with Rock n Roll and he sang a full octave lower than album cut.  I’m sure they weren’t alone in that sentiment.

 

 

The night he had the flu? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I never expect a singer to sound like the album but of all singers, I give plant a wide birth when it comes to his lack of vocal range. The man could have postponed a shitton of shows because he was sick in 73 and 75 but went on instead. Other singers would have canceled in a heartbeat. I appreciate that a lot.  When I hear the first verses of WTLB from Chicago I cringe because he sounds like his throat is killing him.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
34 minutes ago, hummingbird69 said:

I never expect a singer to sound like the album but of all singers, I give plant a wide birth when it comes to his lack of vocal range. The man could have postponed a shitton of shows because he was sick in 73 and 75 but went on instead. Other singers would have canceled in a heartbeat. I appreciate that a lot.  When I hear the first verses of WTLB from Chicago I cringe because he sounds like his throat is killing him.

No one that I have ever seen has asked Plant about this in any interviews.  I think, in hindsight, Grant really let Plant down in this regard, he chose profit over Plants long term vocal health.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, bluecongo said:

No one that I have ever seen has asked Plant about this in any interviews.  I think, in hindsight, Grant really let Plant down in this regard, he chose profit over Plants long term vocal health.  

It was Robert Plants responsibility to take care of 'his' voice, not Peter Grants. Plants warm up routine was cocaine n cigarettes, no wonder why the first couple of songs the vocals sound like shit. Ever hear of a singer that had as many "flu's" as Robert Plant? Me neither. Should Grant have cancelled the shows when Jimmy Page injured his fingers as well? Should they have waited until he was fully healed? If Grant had cancelled all the shows/tours where Plant had "the flu" along with when Page's fingers were injured, (and lets not forget that Plant didn't want to record Presence while in a wheelchair either) I would say that would have effectively destroyed the band. Grant made the right decision as a manager. And yes, Grant chose "profits over Plants long term vocal health". A managers job is turn an artists work into profit, not babysit a bunch of adults.

Rock n Roll was not designed for "long term health". 

Just my two cents folks. 

 

Edited by blindwillie127

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, bluecongo said:

No one that I have ever seen has asked Plant about this in any interviews.  I think, in hindsight, Grant really let Plant down in this regard, he chose profit over Plants long term vocal health.  

IDK?  Do you think Grant really forced him to go on or was it ultimately his choice?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dan Rather asked him in his interview. Plant responded that performing with the flu several times was partially responsible, however he placed most of the blame on an adrenaline shot a doctor gave him during the 72' tour in Australia after he lost his voice after a gig. Don't quite know what adrenaline would have to do with it but I am not a sawbones.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

It is interesting to think back to those times in 1975-77. None of my close friends saw Zep until 1977.  We knew some older friends who saw them in 1975.   They just said they were blown away and it was the greatest concert ever - no comments about Plant's voice.

I do recall wondering about the vocals on some of HOTH in 1973 thinking what is that?  NQ - I get the atmospherics.  But TSRTS vocals?  Did not seem right to me.  Still don't.  But I digress.  When PG came out it was just so overwhelming.  I never really thought about the vocal change.  Every Zep album was different so I just thought he is singing this way to fit the mood of the song.  I loved the dark vibe to his voice in things like Kashmir, Trampled, Dying Time, Sick again, Custard Pie, Wanton Song.  So much of that album had a dark and mysterious vibe to it.  Same thing for Presence.  Loved every bit of it and thought Plant was perfect for the songs.   I was not thinking his voice changed or was shot - I was thinking these songs and lyrics and delivery are so great and so different.

Then the movie and soundtrack came out in fall 1976 and again, none of us thought "oh his voice is shot".  We just loved the music.  One thing I really noticed was how much better I liked the vocals in TSRTS track compared to the album version.  And the Rain Song - so much better vocals live on that soundtrack than on HOTH.   Then I finally saw them in 1977 and was blown away by Plant's vocals, and of course all the rest of it.  I did not hear my first bootleg til around 1979 - the BBC 1971 session.

I guess I was so involved in digging the music and the newness of PG and Presence, I never really thought his voice changed.  I thought he just changed his approach to fit the songs and lyrics.

Looking back now and hearing so many live shows over the years it is all so obvious, but  back in 75-76 I was not thinking about his voice may have changed, and none of my friends ever said anything about that - we just all loved every bit of Zeppelin.  Maybe because I was 16 and it was all so overwhelming to get a double album like PG after waiting 2 years from HOTH.  Or maybe because his voice could sound so different from album to album and track to track anyway across all the albums. 

 

Edited by John M

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Loooooooove the rawness and the crack of his '75 voice. On Dime there is a Minneapolis '75 show where he is so raw and has to sing Wanton Song an octave down, which IMO opinion makes it some Zep musical gold. I will take the '75 voice over the '73 one. But I will take the 69 voice over all of them 😄

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Vocals are the toughest instrument of all.  Anyone else can have a bad night and it isn't so noticeable ... at least not as noticeable as a shot voice.  Stinking cold.  Bronchitis.  The flu.  Unless it's at the passing-out point, anyone but the singer can usually tough it out for a show.  Even at Jimmy's worst, he could usually grind out a performance.  On top of this, a singer, when on a long tour, has to protect the vocals chords, knowing there about 30 shows ahead of him.  You might feel great one night, get a little too enthusiastic, and find out the next morning when you wake up that your voice is shot and needs 3 days to get back in shape.  Too bad, you've got a big show before then and to cancel it will piss of the fans and cost a fortune in refunds.   

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
59 minutes ago, NealR2000 said:

Vocals are the toughest instrument of all.  Anyone else can have a bad night and it isn't so noticeable ... at least not as noticeable as a shot voice.  Stinking cold.  Bronchitis.  The flu.  Unless it's at the passing-out point, anyone but the singer can usually tough it out for a show.  Even at Jimmy's worst, he could usually grind out a performance.  On top of this, a singer, when on a long tour, has to protect the vocals chords, knowing there about 30 shows ahead of him.  You might feel great one night, get a little too enthusiastic, and find out the next morning when you wake up that your voice is shot and needs 3 days to get back in shape.  Too bad, you've got a big show before then and to cancel it will piss of the fans and cost a fortune in refunds.   

To continue the  January 73 UK tour & the January 75 US tour with his severly damaged voice was Robert´s Kamikaze trip into serious voice problems. I still can´t believe that he didn´t pull the emergency brake- to postpone the concerts & heal the vocal chords would have been a proper formula.

And where was their far-sighted, coked-up MANAGER, Mr. Peter Grant? It would have been his duty to stop this madness. But maybe he was too busy making poster seller lifes miserable, or doing similar highly important things.

Grant was an eyewitness, every night, but he didn´t act. Failure, what a shame!

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
37 minutes ago, Autumn Moon said:

To continue the  January 73 UK tour & the January 75 US tour with his severly damaged voice was Robert´s Kamikaze trip into serious voice problems. I still can´t believe that he didn´t pull the emergency brake- to postpone the concerts & heal the vocal chords would have been a proper formula.

And where was their far-sighted, coked-up MANAGER, Mr. Peter Grant? It would have been his duty to stop this madness. But maybe he was too busy making poster seller lifes miserable, or doing similar highly important things.

Grant was an eyewitness, every night, but he didn´t act. Failure, what a shame!

 

In Peter's defense, he always made it clear that he left the band to focus on their music, and he took care of everything else.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
32 minutes ago, NealR2000 said:

In Peter's defense, he always made it clear that he left the band to focus on their music, and he took care of everything else.

One does have to wonder though no? Grant was the manager and the job of management is to protect the band. I would think with Robert sounding like he was snorting glass powder while sucking on a dick would have been a rather large red flag. Same with Jimmy's finger. You combine the two and any sane manager would have postponed.

I have always said Grant was A#1 as a manager from 68' - 74' but then went completely off the rails. TBH I don't think Grant sucked, he was just an addict, like Jimmy & Bonzo, and Cole. The story of Zeppelin is the ultimate Greek tragedy in music.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Grant was a part of that crazy ride and yes - he needed to be a bit more distant to see the forest from outside the trees. The temptations that came with managing the great beast that was Led Zeppelin were too great it seems. Still - fucked if I could have been involved at any level from a gofer for the roadies to Peter Grant himself and not partaken in what surely must have been the most epic continuing party/tour experience in history. For all his shortcomings - he was the perfect manager early on (as already stated). And there is also the possibility he did discuss the '75 tour with Page/Plant and they decided to go on with it maybe over the objections of Grant - who knows??? We don't know - unless SAJ or someone else with a good knowledge base has more specific info. It's easy to speculate without knowing what actually went down - but yeah - Grant did himself (and the band) no favours by immersing himself in that excess for sure.

Still, at the end of the day - if I ever got to meet Grant before he passed, I'd shake his hand. Manager of the best band EVER. He holds the legend status he deserves IMHO.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Some blame on Grant, but first of all Plant was far more a "master of ceremonies" with the partying, I've never heard that

he was even 1/100 the total maniacs that Bonham, Page, and ?? possibly Grant were with their practically heroic substance

alcohol intakes. So possibly some effect on his voice, but way overstated. Second even though Grant was closest to Page,

you could make a very strong case to cancel the entire 77' tour because Page was in poor health and a junkie, and did not

sound as if he had practiced much. Remember also that postponing a tour or changing many dates around can be very

difficult. Anyway, sure Plant lost range, etc., but remember that Robert was such an overwhelming talent that he was still

IMHO a great vocalist. Grant may have pushed a bit much, but I'm not entirely convinced of that, never heard or read anything like that. To me some posters make it seem like Plant was a baseball pitcher who had been forced to pitch 3 games in a row. It would never cross the mind of the baseball(or Rock manager) that you could be sidelining someone

for a long time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This was discussed a lot already on the forum and I think they should have taken a break in October 1972 already and then make each tour short enough and each break long enough for Roberts voice to stay intact.

I think the problem was that those were the early pioneer days of big rock and roll bands and the management wasn't that complex and developed and also you must know that the decisions about music were left to the band and how the band sounds, including Robert's voice was therefore perhaps not the decision of the management.

Now why Robert alone didn't take a break and shortened the tours for medical and musical reasons we will never know. Partly it's probably just the excess and the ego and to keep the show going, partly he was maybe actually unaware of how permanent the problem will be and partly somebody once mentioned his middle class mentality about it, which is to keep going while it lasts.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...