Jump to content

sk8rat

Members
  • Posts

    225
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by sk8rat

  1. 20 minutes ago, Strider said:

    And you know he was a 'burnout' how exactly?

    No, he did not record bootlegs...he recorded concerts and traded tapes among friends but never bootleggers. It was other people who made his tapes available to bootleggers.

    well just basing off the info we have from his alleged friends, they says he was still living with his mom and was a janitor in his later life. that doesn't exactly scream success to me.

    and yes he was a bootlegger. he recorded and distributed copies of someone else's intellectual property. it doesn't matter if he didn't make any money off of it.

  2. 3 hours ago, JTM said:

    Here is an interesting read for those that feel they have been ignored in a Record Shop/Store.

    http://www.sevenstreets.com/record-store-day-lets-keep-record-shops-scary/

    that has to be one of the biggest pieces of hipster elitist nonsense I have ever heard. we get it, you work at a record store, you're are too cool for school. your opinion is right and anyone who think different is wrong. now fuck off and let my buy my shit and get on my way.

  3. sadly robert plants voice was nothing like what attracted me to led zeppelin by that point. a friend bought the album and we listed to it and there were bits and pieces that were ok but to be honest, had jimmy produced it and got someone else on vocals it would have been better.

    it seemed like they were trying to go for a more spiritual thing (again probably more roberts idea) which I dont really care for all that much.  the stuff they did in zep like kashmir and no quarter were awesome but the later stuff just seems like they ran out of creative juice and were trying to squeeze out the last drops of what the had.

  4. 12 hours ago, JTM said:

    Did you consider that maybe he thought you were being a dick....'Rolling his eyes'.....What was your question.....

    I didn't do anything that would have warranted him thinking I was being a dick. I walked in, looked around grabbed a record then went up to pay. I asked if they accepted cards or cash only. 

  5. On 5/28/2016 at 0:42 AM, zepster1979 said:

    More likely he increased the prices because he has to rent the place and pay for everything himself. Nothing to offend but I do understand local sellers as I know of how hard it's to manage your own record shop. The bigger stores are selling cheaper because they're purchasing on wholesale. Sad to say, the corporate syndrom has been already introduced to the music industry. Smaller sellers have a thigh time nowadays...saying that I confess I am the one of them, though selling only as a private collector now.

    I didnt really have a problem with the higher price. it was the guy who worked there. he was rude, not helpful at all and had a pissy attitude. when I asked him a question he just rolled his eyes and didn't answer. I regret giving them my money. I would rather go to a corporate chain store that hires nice people than a store run by rude hipsters.

  6. I went to a small record store in seattle the other day and got a copy of led zeppelin at the fillmore west but the guy who worked there was a total dick. for zeppelin they had mostly bootlegs and just a couple studio albums. I wont be going back that is for sure. it kind of defeats the purpose of  having an independent store that charges more than the bigger stores when the customer service sucks.

  7. he hit the drums really hard not with finesse like most. even when he was trying to go light it seemed hard for him to not start slamming on them. also another thing that sets his drumming apart from most is that drummers like bill ward and ginger baker would get a really good swing going with the bass guitar while john bonham would play along with the guitar. I favor bonham because he has a really deep and bassy sound (not just his bass drum) while a lot of drummer have a really snappy drum sound that I dont like.

    on when the levee breaks (arguable one of his most influential tracks) they used an echo machine while recording.

  8. 20 hours ago, Jimmywalnutz said:

    I can agree that Maiden is the successor to Led Zeppelin, no doubt. But the genre changed.

    Harris and company where just so so good but it was Harris' band. The early albums all play off his "lead" bass. Personal changes didn't stop them, Harris' was more driven than any of his contemporaries and like Page he a vision and he succeeded .

     Bruce Dickinson was the new Robert Plant, although he came in after the sophomore release. But he could emote, scream and sing beautifully. No one trick pony. No one could sing like Plant in his prime but Dickinson was nearly every bit as good but the music didn't allow or call for that primal blues based element.

    They did release five consecutive masterpieces and a classic live album. Sold out Radio City 13 consecutive nights in '85. Fell apart after Steve Harris' decided to use synth on Somewhere In Time. So eventually his vision killed the band. Now they attempt to recreate past glory. Sad.

     Never another Zeppelin. .

     

     

     

  9. ^great picture. I am jealous :) 

    in some pictures his eyes look dark but I have always felt that the true color of his eyes is blue. I don't think he would have sang "Good times, bad times, You know I had my share, When my woman left home, With a brown eyed man, Well, I still don't seem to care" if he too had brown eyes :P

    4rb6ex.jpg

  10. 19 minutes ago, Kiwi_Zep_Fan87 said:

    Rush. 

    they are definitely an acquired taste but to call them a cult band and underrated I think is a bit off. they have a huge fan base. led zeppelin was definitely more influential than them though.

    I think there is a huge difference between rush and led zeppelin even though they are always compared. with led zeppelin it was so much more than just writing awesome songs, rush was really more about writing very climactic and intricate instrumentals. also geddy lee's vocals are absolutely atrocious imo.

  11. 16 hours ago, Kiwi_Zep_Fan87 said:

    I can think of at least 1 band that is as good as Led Zeppelin in terms of factors such as musicianship and (who in my opinion) is better than Led Zeppelin in terms of factors such as album themes and lyrics. Now, Led Zeppelin triumphed in terms of marketability and mass appeal. The band that I am speaking of, remains pretty underrated even today and has been regarded as a cult band for quite a while because of its song themes (apart from other things) and has been declared by some to be an acquired taste

    what band is that?

  12. there have been plenty of bands that are just as talented; writing and playing wise as led zeppelin. the problem is that people basically want another band that is a mirror image of led zeppelin but then when a band comes out that sounds like them people just say they are a rip off of led zeppelin and if they dont sound like them, then people say they aren't as good as led zeppelin, so in a way, no matter what a rock band does, they will always be placed under led zeppelin. led zeppelin was also the first of their kind and no one else can change that.

    jimmy page, john bonham and john paul jones were musical geniuses but robert plants voice was what really set them apart. sure there are some sound a likes (billy squier, david coverdale ect...) but none of them have that natural and primal scream like robert did, his voice could be piercing and soothing at the same time. most rock bands have very gritty and masculine vocalists while robert plants vocals were very vulnerable and feminine but with a very hard edge at the same time.

    if you go listen to p.j. probys album "three week hero" (it was the first album led zeppelin recorded as a band without robert plant on vocals) I think you will see that without him they probably wouldn't have reached the success they did.

  13. we have a record store near by. it is the only independently owned one left in the area. the owner is a bit scatter brained and is not the best person to do business with. outside the store there are huge signs saying everything is half off but then he marks the prices up crazy high to the point where at half off you are still paying top dollar. also, they test every record so there will be piles in the store that just sit there that he wont sell because he hasn't listened to them yet.

    being the hipsterville that we are, we have actually have a surprising amount of record shops but prices are pretty high. the best bet to get some good vinyl for less than $5 a piece are thrift stores and garage sales.

    back during christmas time I stopped by another music store to look around and they were trying to sell an older copy of physical graffiti for $54. it wasn't old enough to be special and it wasn't one of the remasters either. 

  14. 1 hour ago, BronYrAur5231 said:

    I actually hunted out this thread immediately after viewing this video. You beat me to it. Shame something as great as the almighty Led Zeppelin should be associated with Trump

    at least it was the protesters playing it and not trump trying to reach out to the youth like Hilary. regardless led zeppelin should be kept away from politics, they are far above something so pedestrian.

×
×
  • Create New...