Jump to content

The Rover 75

Members
  • Posts

    640
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by The Rover 75

  1. Both bands were fantastic, but the only similarity is that they were both rock bands. Zep had lengthy solos, the Who rarely did, except perhaps for Live At Leeds. Very talented musicians in both, but The Who had some punk overtones from time to time, where Zep had some Metal overtones occasionally.

  2. Great video thanks, supposedly there is a new album in the works, that will feature all of the remaining original members, While most of them did play on WTMN 2, this is supposed to be for the whole album, could be very interesting.

  3. I think Jeff is a phenomenal player, but I lose interest without a vocalist. It's too bad, because of the older guitar players that play live somewhat regularly, Jeff is the best. Gotta wonder how popular he would have been, had he a powerful vocalist/songwriter.

    I think Satriani falls into the same category, I enjoy him 10x more, when he's playing with Chickenfoot.

  4. On 5/12/2016 at 0:17 PM, IpMan said:

    I believe Rover meant that Jimi re-invented how electric guitar was played and could be played. Jimi was the first to go batshit with the tremolo, he was the first to use distortion & effects to such a degree to obtain the sound he wanted. He was the first guitarist who could play well that also projected such intensity & sexuality to the crowd. Clapton & McCartney were just as blown away by Jimi's stage presence as they were by his virtuosity.

    Jimi was the triple threat as a guitarist akin to the triple treat in theatre, Jimi could play very, very well, he could write, and he could project. No other guitarist before him could do all three, not even close.

    Yes, that is correct IpMan, that's exactly what I meant.

    kingzoso, I am quite aware of the electric guitar's history, I play one thanks.

     

  5. "Totally agree with you on Clapton though. He does what he does well, but that's ALL he does. Dude bores me to tears. "

    That's the only part of what you said I would agree with.

    We really shouldn't compare the 2, both solid choices,  Balthazor give the Hendrix catalog more of a listen, you may like what you hear.

  6. 2 hours ago, Charles J. White said:

    He seemed to be such a charming character, I would loved to have seen him perform in person, but alas was too young - he is one of my fav singers though, a true blue collar style of voice

    I was fortunate to see them in '78, as they opened for, & blew away Aerosmith. Such a talent, such a loss.

  7. Since I reside in Illinois I have seen them many times, sometimes by accident, they were on the bill. They have never disappointed, even a few years ago. However, their best show that I saw, was in the early 90's,  where they were the headliner.

  8. I saw a video of the performance which I believe was Hyde Park a while back on what used to be the Palladia channel, & it was thoroughly enjoying. I will agree that ELO is not for everyone, but if you keep an open mind, it was a quite good show.

  9. On 3/30/2016 at 1:36 PM, paul carruthers said:

    ^^ Hmmm, different strokes I guess. I feel the 80s was the best period for Rush, with the 90s being a close second...

    That I would agree with you on, the early albums of the 70's had more fire & passion, but I guess if we all liked everything exactly the same, it would be boring.

     

  10. 17 hours ago, BledZabbath said:

    Glad you like Sabbath, Marmalade, good album but not one of their best, but certainly better than anything post Never Say Die!

    I liked their stretch from Master of Reality to SBS best, although Vol. 4 is a mixed bag. NSD was a pleasant surprise, as was 13, but I'll stick with the 3 I mentioned here.

×
×
  • Create New...