Cat Posted April 26, 2008 Share Posted April 26, 2008 Oakland (CA) Tribune April 9, 1969 by By Peggy King Tribute Staff Writer Rock music is generally considered the garbage heap of the popular music field, replacing hill-billy, once the lowest note on the contemporary scale. Thus, it becomes quite painful for a critic to praise Jimmy Page. Almost, as painful as reading most of the Bay Area music columns. Jimmy Page is a pallid, unobtrusive, 20-year-old musical genius from England who is currently walking the deli-, cate, spidery t i g h t r o p e of greatness on the American pop scene. To expose his talent to praise, to dissect his ideas and put them into bungling words and innovative blues patterns would probably be a good story, but just another story about a young musician's struggle to make it. The pain comes with the reality that exposure to the general public would place Page on that lowest rung of pop music levels. Jimmy Page is a rock musician. Shudder. You see, he must be a rock musician because of classifications, holy classifications. These classifications — rock (into which is lumped hard r o c k, rock 'n' roll, soul, rock-blues and f o 1 k -r o c k), blues, country - western (or Glenn Campbell), jazz, bal- What is most important to remember when approaching rock — for the critic and the critical public — is that just as in all other areas of music, there is more bad rock than good. There happens to be more bad rock than any other bad music simply because there is more rock on the current scene than any other music. This may appear an oversimplification. However, there is only one Beethoven, Art Tatum, Miles David, Enrico Caruso, Frank Sinatra and with little doubt) one Jimmy Page. The cream generally rises to the top. Many critics and the adult public appear to have come to the conclusion that all the noise the kids are making with their drums, guitars and things is rock, their way of taking out their hostilities on the taxpayers and it, too, will pass. Some of it will, hopefully. But what we are concerned with is the part that won't, hopefully. The general public tends to listen to the critics more than to their phonographs to evaluate the music their youth are making and listening to. When Davy Jones sings out his appeal which is geared more to the hormone structure of the teen age girl than to anything else it is treated with the same diffidence by the critic as when Eric Clapton challenges the emotions and the minds of society to remember that music is a means of expressing a concept of an idea, as well as just a way to "let it all hang out." Perhaps It is time for the music world to consider that rock is a valid medium, that it has produced perhaps more real talent than any other area of music and grapple with toe thought that it is here to stay. Last week, John Mayall was k i d n a pp e d from rock. The walking (and playing) epitome of blues-rock, Mayall was such a success at San Francisco's Winterland, when pitted against such seasoned talents as Majic Sam and Bo Diddley, that local c r i t i c immediately elevated h i m from Bill Graham's world of Fillmore and the less-ecstatic Avalon Ballroom, and considered him in jazz columns as "the blues' (which takes the curse off). Mayall was born a blues man. But Mayall is a rock musician because he will not be confined in the narrow, introverted styles of accepted jazz and blues that allow the performer to "improvise" just so far. This idea will kill them, eventually. For example, a listener leaves a Miles Davis performance and his mind explodes into a thousand ice cubes. Relief. One wonders why such a great talent confines himself to his egotistical, introverted approach to jazz. "Expand. Go ahead." one wants to say. He does. But, too often, it is the same story told in dazzling style. The same unfortunate situation exists with most great blues artists today. Bessie Smith was perhaps the best blues, maybe Billie Holliday or Mabel Mercer, as far as s i n g e r s go. Buffy Saint-Marie is essentially a blues singer. She tells the stories of blues, the human condition. But B u f f y is rock, folk rock and, sometimes, "controversial protest." Bob Dylan sings the blues but it is a harsh, contemporary blues. Eric Clapton plays a jazz guitar to equal the talents of Davis or that of perhaps the greatest jazz pianist to date, Bill Evans. Thus, rock is not only here to stay, it is necessary. While young musicians have musical concepts to express, they are denied the freedom to express them because of traditional attitudes toward a c c e p t e d styles. The answer is simple. They find their own "style." Thus, rock is Mayall, it is Phil Ochs, it is the vitamin quest of "Paul Revere and the Raiders" and it is the emotional and psychedelic challenge of Eric Clapton. It is the new blues, new jazz and even the new Lawrence Welk. Listen to Jimmy Page. Finally, after several years of burst eardrums, intellectual stimulation, semi-emotional involvement, o n e who has cared enough to have weathered it is rewarded. Page approaches the ultimate because he is a fusion of comes g r e a t n e s s as it emerges. He has taken the jazz - blues - rock - folk - classical elements and woven them into a sound that makes it with the human ear, heart and mind. His group, on the music scene for less than two years, is called "Led Zeppelin," admittedly a title that will probably turn off the average over-30 citizen. His music, however, will not. Although he is British, Page's success story falls into the pattern of the American dream. At 17, he was third man on the totem in the first group out of England to make an intellectual impact on the world, 'The Yardbirds." Eric Clapton headed it, Jeff Beck was middle support and Jimmy Page' was the waspy talent in the background. After the group broke up, each to go his separate way, the waspy talent wanted to This offer was based on the company's response to his talent when with "The Yardbirds" and to a few reels of tape with his newly formed group. Page's formal U.S. debut was earlier this year at the " Fillmore West, where the response was a standing ovation, even from members of the usually silent majority who sat pock-marked in the dim-lit hippie audience. When a group makes it at the Fillmore, it is made. Finally out from under the shadow of Clapton, Page tries quietly to cope with his overwhelming success. 'I didn't personally expect anything like the Fillmore," he said in an interview. "I was afraid the audience might be apprehensive about the old "Yardbirds' thing.'' The "Yardbirds thing" has to do with England's bias, Page explained. "There they put, one person up on a pedestal. And it was, of course, Eric. Jeff Beck came and worked so hard. It was still Eric. The ones below the pedestal just don't have a chance." Since then. Beck has made it with his own group in America; Clapton made it with "Cream," then became dissatisfied, dissolved the group and now has the music world waiting to sec what his next move will be. "I went through a stage of paranoia for a while," Page said of the time after the through emotional and mental h a n g u p s doing it. Finally, when the "Led Zeppelin" was realized, Page was give the largest advance in the history of rock music by Atlantic Records to become their client. and Jeff making it so big, what were the people going to think of me? Who does he think he is that he can have his own group, they might say." Finally Page stopped thinking of identity and began to think of what he wanted to do. Through a genius for selecting musicians and some s h e e r luck of having one or two excellent ones referred by Terry Reed and other m u s i c i a n f r i e n d s , Page formed his group. They are Page on lead guitar; R o b e r t Plant, vocal: John Paul Jones, bass and John Bonhan, all British, all excellent musicians. Led Zeppelin has completed its first U.S. and will open again at more West on April 24. Anyone who has any interest in hearing a musical concept which perhaps best expresses the universal human condition of our times may hear it beginning at 8 p.m. That evening "Led Zeppelin" makes "Jefferson Airplane" sound like the Lawrence Welk of rock music. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteveAJones Posted April 27, 2008 Share Posted April 27, 2008 (edited) Author tries hard to make a profound point here but I don't think she succeeds. Wouldn't Jimmy be surprised to learn he was only 20 in 1969! Edited April 27, 2008 by SteveAJones Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lucyinthesky Posted May 7, 2008 Share Posted May 7, 2008 Yeah, when he was 17 he hung around with Neil Christian, not with Eric Clapton... Anyway, cool article. Got it from an old newspaper? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.