Phonostage Posted October 27, 2018 Share Posted October 27, 2018 Does anyone know where this might have come from? After some careful listening it is a mono version of three tracks that appear on other releases but they are a different sounding mix, one a different pitch or speed and also with less top/tail edits so you can hear Robert Plant say things like 'this is the time where we usually do have a cup of tea..' etc.. also the mix is clearly different at the beginning of Stairway to Heaven where the reverb is all over the place.. Could these be scrapped mixes or something? I was told that this was the producer's copy from recording. It has Space Odyssey tracks on the other side! I would like any information anyone can give me because I haven't seen another disc like it. This is an IBC Acetate - it is quite heavy and probably has a metal base. Thanks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phonostage Posted October 27, 2018 Author Share Posted October 27, 2018 Sorry I should have added - they are three live tracks, two from the Paris Theatre in 1971 and then White Summer from the Playhouse Theatre in 1969 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteveAJones Posted October 28, 2018 Share Posted October 28, 2018 If your description is completely accurate it could be a program producer's copy. My hunch is if you aggressively compare it to program content that is known to exist you will find the music content matches that which is already in circulation on bootlegs. I'd like to be wrong! As to the acetate itself, it could be an acetate for an original BBC Transcription Disc. https://www.discogs.com/label/150837-BBC-Transcription-Services Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phonostage Posted October 28, 2018 Author Share Posted October 28, 2018 Hi. I have checked and the three tracks are exactly the same as the BBC sessions, I checked evert note! just different mixes or editing and not cropped down as much as the released versions. Definitely a studio sound. Dead clear apart from the crackes, no way recorded by a device at a venue Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteveAJones Posted October 28, 2018 Share Posted October 28, 2018 24 minutes ago, Phonostage said: Hi. I have checked and the three tracks are exactly the same as the BBC sessions, I checked evert note! just different mixes or editing and not cropped down as much as the released versions. Definitely a studio sound. Dead clear apart from the crackes, no way recorded by a device at a venue Interesting. Accepting what you say at face value, the acetate does seem to be a producer's copy of material recorded for the BBC. IF it does contain any banter from Robert, the other band members or moments of the musical performances not in circulation you may really have something here. It remains up to you to decide if you're going to have a digital clone of the content uploaded so that it can be enjoyed more widely. If that is something you're interested in, I can provide referrals to you -- people willing to produce a digital clone at no cost. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zeplz71 Posted October 28, 2018 Share Posted October 28, 2018 14 hours ago, Phonostage said: Does anyone know where this might have come from? After some careful listening it is a mono version of three tracks that appear on other releases but they are a different sounding mix, one a different pitch or speed and also with less top/tail edits so you can hear Robert Plant say things like 'this is the time where we usually do have a cup of tea..' etc.. also the mix is clearly different at the beginning of Stairway to Heaven where the reverb is all over the place.. Could these be scrapped mixes or something? I was told that this was the producer's copy from recording. It has Space Odyssey tracks on the other side! I would like any information anyone can give me because I haven't seen another disc like it. This is an IBC Acetate - it is quite heavy and probably has a metal base. Thanks IMHO, that is fake/home-made & I've seen a few similar ones like the one attached which has the same hand-writing, lol. There were many different mixes of that BBC 71 session through the years. This is taken from one of those existing mixes. Here's a similar Beatles one that is assessed as "This is surely not an authorized disc. Someone probably cut it for their own use"https://www.beatlesource.com/bs/ao-ibc1.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phonostage Posted October 28, 2018 Author Share Posted October 28, 2018 That may be so however the Beatles reference supposes that the tracks are just copies of those already released, this contains wider edits than those that made it to the BBC published recordings of these tracks. And some different (or unmixed) mixing. I can provide clips of some of the bits that haven't made it onto the complete BBC sessions or the Acetate Masters... Also what you see above (the Beatles reference) is just an opinion, on the Moody Blues forum someone confirmed that the IBC discs of this type were made as one-offs for producers and engineers to test mixes. What seems to make the difference is whether or not they are the same as the album or released tracks or if they were different edits or mixes. These are different. See here: https://991.com/Buy/ProductInformation.aspx?StockNumber=574641&PrinterFriendly=1 and here: http://www.themoodyblues.co.uk/acetates.htm check the picture of the IBC disc with 'A DB DISC' written on it then scroll down to point 2 in the 'What are acetates?' section I have now read around quite a lot here and recorded the file into the computer - (which has only served to enhance any noise and the record sounds better at the moment ) - but I don't want to play the record any more than necessary, I have heard they wear quickly - so I will edit the sound file and upload some clips. I am now convinced because of Robert Plant's banter, the different tape pitch of one of the tracks and the overall sound which is much clearer and studio-like then the BBC sessions which is heavily edited and de-noised, that this is a studio test run of rejected mixes - hence the screwed up reverb on 'Stairway To Heaven' amongst other things.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phonostage Posted October 28, 2018 Author Share Posted October 28, 2018 Also of course these are not the same writing. The photo where the writing is in red is by another hand. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zeplz71 Posted October 28, 2018 Share Posted October 28, 2018 1 hour ago, Phonostage said: Also of course these are not the same writing. The photo where the writing is in red is by another hand. They're exactly the same. Yours has little circles above the "i", that's literally the only difference. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chillumpuffer Posted October 28, 2018 Share Posted October 28, 2018 1 hour ago, zeplz71 said: They're exactly the same. Yours has little circles above the "i", that's literally the only difference. Commas instead of full stops after the numbers and the "A" in ADB Disc is different Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phonostage Posted October 28, 2018 Author Share Posted October 28, 2018 (edited) That is not true - it is clearly different, look at the 'E's. One writes the E with either one vertical line in a curve or two max, leaving only either one or two horizontals to add - the other one vertical and three horizontal lines every time. That is a fundamental difference and there are a few others. Thanks Edited October 28, 2018 by Phonostage Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phonostage Posted October 28, 2018 Author Share Posted October 28, 2018 Any actual graphologists out there worth their salt care to interject here? We are at risk of drifting off on a tangent! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pb! Posted October 29, 2018 Share Posted October 29, 2018 The red flags for me are the 'unreleased' and 'from the yet to be released...' text on the labels. No cutting technician or whoever would write anything subjective like that on a legitimate acetate. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phonostage Posted October 29, 2018 Author Share Posted October 29, 2018 They were actually unreleased for many years after this was made.. would it help if I uploaded a couple of clips? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators sam_webmaster Posted October 29, 2018 Administrators Share Posted October 29, 2018 44 minutes ago, Phonostage said: They were actually unreleased for many years after this was made.. would it help if I uploaded a couple of clips? The songs were released on the fourth LP later the same year as this BBC session, which aired just a few days after being recorded in April '71. Personally, I don't think that acetate is legit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phonostage Posted October 29, 2018 Author Share Posted October 29, 2018 9 hours ago, sam_webmaster said: The songs were released on the fourth LP later the same year as this BBC session, which aired just a few days after being recorded in April '71. Personally, I don't think that acetate is legit. HI - No sorry what I meant was these versions of the songs weren't released for many years. They were recorded live for a John peel session in the case of two of them. They then appeared on The Complete BBC Sessions in 2016, however these versions as I said are not edited the same, they include Robert Plant introducing the songs 'Here's a little something off our 4th album' and other rambles rather then just beginning at the beginning of the track, also it is a mix that didn't make it though to the final one as the reverb is being messed about with at the beginning of Robert's vocal track on Stairway to Heaven that is not present or is reduced on the released 2016 version. This is on Robert's vocals only so has not been applied globally by a live hacker transcribing the disc at some stage later. This is a recording of a mix of a released song that has been transcribed to disc in the middle of mixing or similar. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
babysquid Posted October 30, 2018 Share Posted October 30, 2018 On 10/29/2018 at 4:27 AM, Pb! said: The red flags for me are the 'unreleased' and 'from the yet to be released...' text on the labels. No cutting technician or whoever would write anything subjective like that on a legitimate acetate. I’m no expert but this would get my alarm bell ringing too. Why would that need to be written on an in-house demo. The only reason it appears to be there is for enticement. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteveAJones Posted October 30, 2018 Share Posted October 30, 2018 3 hours ago, babysquid said: I’m no expert but this would get my alarm bell ringing too. Why would that need to be written on an in-house demo. The only reason it appears to be there is for enticement. Anyone may have written that on the label in the intervening years. I defer to Sam's assessment, however, the only way to know for certain is to hear the content. The content either contains previously unheard Robert Plant banter or it doesn't. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phonostage Posted October 30, 2018 Author Share Posted October 30, 2018 16 minutes ago, SteveAJones said: Anyone may have written that on the label in the intervening years. I defer to Sam's assessment, however, the only way to know for certain is to hear the content. The content either contains previously unheard Robert Plant banter or it doesn't. Righto - I will do a bit of editing (It's one mega-file at the moment!) and upload the clips.. that'll be the teller - hopefully! Thanks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JTM Posted October 30, 2018 Share Posted October 30, 2018 2 hours ago, SteveAJones said: Anyone may have written that on the label in the intervening years. I defer to Sam's assessment, however, the only way to know for certain is to hear the content. The content either contains previously unheard Robert Plant banter or it doesn't. It won't, bootlegs of the April 71 BBC Paris Theatre performance contain all the banter the OP reports that is on this "so called" acetate. Nothing new, nothing unheard here. . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phonostage Posted October 30, 2018 Author Share Posted October 30, 2018 Were they recorded by devices at the show or were they studio recordings? Thanks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JTM Posted October 30, 2018 Share Posted October 30, 2018 5 minutes ago, Phonostage said: Were they recorded by devices at the show or were they studio recordings? Thanks Live recordings made by The BBC. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phonostage Posted October 30, 2018 Author Share Posted October 30, 2018 Here we are - a couple of clips.. tried to get a bit of talking on both and the odd reverb on Stairway to Heaven - hope this is of some interest.. Drat! Just tried and it won't let me attach an audio file! Any ideas anyone? Do I have to get an account with someone I will never use again? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteveAJones Posted October 30, 2018 Share Posted October 30, 2018 21 minutes ago, Phonostage said: Do I have to get an account with someone I will never use again? It would be helpful, though JTM sounds convinced there's nothing new here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phonostage Posted October 30, 2018 Author Share Posted October 30, 2018 He might be right but it would be fun to post it.. any tips? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.