English, please?!?

What an EPIC photo!

I'm happy for you, Rick!

Just found it of interest, that's all. I think it's great to take in all viewpoints and decipher what makes sense. There are some who I don't watch/listen to at all because they are so insistent on pushing their own agenda. But as a whole, I also find most shows to at least be enlightening to others views and some downright informative. Common ground, mstork. Have a nice Sunday! Peace. Peace.

What You Want - John Butler Trio

So Fine - Guns N Roses

Cinco de mayo + I'll Have Another = BIG MONEY!!! 43-1, beautiful!

Nobody brought Bill Maher into this until you did. I find it pretty humorous that you choose to watch his show and dislike him so.

That's funny because we have just filled up how many pages because of your attempt to do just that with statement on page 1?

What I mean is....it's only May 5th. The season is one month down and 5 months to go. Glad for your enthusiasm for your team, but a reality check is in order. If they are doing as well in mid-September, then I may be onboard with you. Until then, it's just about 17% through the marathon that is the MLB season. Good luck!

.....May 5th.....

^ Interesting stuff, Sam. Thank you for posting it! I was born near Syracuse the day they played Buffalo, I would like to think they were traveling through my town while I was coming into the world. My father played WLL for me while I was in my crib, that I do know! Neat to know they were touring so close in proximity during my first days of life!!

Zurich - 1980

You've Got To Fight For Your Right (To Party) - Beastie Boys

No Speak, No Slave - The Black Crowes

Can't Explain - The Who

I knew he must've been in rough shape when he didn't come to the HOF induction last month. Sorry to hear this, glad he is not in pain any longer. RIP

Nope.....status quo.

Wow! Sad to see this. RIP Junior.

I have researched this, since you asked, and the terms are not clearly defined by various dictionaries. Some differntiate based on spacing, while others just give multiple meanings of the same spelling. However, I have made my intented meaning of the use of the word I chose clearly a number of times to the person who keeps bringing this up (not you Type O), but it seems to be falling on deaf ears or eyes in the case of this forum. I was referring to a person, not an act by a person. It's kinda funny to me that it brings out such outrage, as MM said the other use of the word is not based on homosexuality at all. But sometimes people choose to look at things from only one viewpoint, even though evidence is there for other views as well. Whatever, not my problem.

That is exactly true! That is why I asked a few pages ago why it was a homosexual reference....that question was never answered. You have made my point, MM.