bga Posted November 13, 2008 Share Posted November 13, 2008 Robert then Freddy. I love Aretha, Ray, Elvis and John but it is Robert's and Freddy's voices that I listen to on an almost daily basis because I just can't get enough of them. The others' voices are great and all but I'll be ok if I don't listen to them for an extended time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FireOpal Posted November 13, 2008 Author Share Posted November 13, 2008 Kiss of Fire (GREAT handle) has linked to Mr. Plant's write up, whereby you can click for the complete list. The lazy amongst you can simply read on: 100 Mary J. Blige 99 Steven Tyler 98 Stevie Nicks 97 Joe Cocker 96 B.B. King 95 Patti LaBelle 94 Karen Carpenter 93 Annie Lennox 92 Morrissey 91 Levon Helm 90 The Everly Brothers 89 Solomon Burke 88 Willie Nelson 87 Don Henley 86 Art Garfunkel 85 Sam Moore 84 Darlene Love 83 Patti Smith 82 Tom Waits 81 John Lee Hooker 80 Frankie Valli 79 Mariah Carey 78 Sly Stone 77 Merle Haggard 76 Steve Perry 75 Iggy Pop 74 James Taylor 73 Dolly Parton 72 John Fogerty 71 Toots Hibbert 70 Gregg Allman 69 Ronnie Spector 68 Wilson Pickett 67 Jerry Lee Lewis 66 Thom Yorke 65 David Ruffin 64 Axl Rose 63 Dion 62 Lou Reed 61 Roger Daltrey 60 Björk 59 Rod Stewart 58 Christina Aguilera 57 Eric Burdon 56 Mavis Staples 55 Paul Rodgers 54 Luther Vandross 53 Muddy Waters 52 Brian Wilson 51 Gladys Knight 50 Bonnie Raitt 49 Donny Hathaway 48 Buddy Holly 47 Jim Morrison 46 Patsy Cline 45 Kurt Cobain 44 Bobby "Blue" Bland 43 George Jones 42 Joni Mitchell 41 Chuck Berry 40 Curtis Mayfield 39 Jeff Buckley 38 Elton John 37 Neil Young 36 Bruce Springsteen 35 Dusty Springfield 34 Whitney Houston 33 Steve Winwood 32 Bono 31 Howlin' Wolf 30 Prince 29 Nina Simone 28 Janis Joplin 27 Hank Williams (Sr.) 26 Jackie Wilson 25 Michael Jackson 24 Van Morrison 23 David Bowie 22 Etta James 21 Johnny Cash 20 Smokey Robinson 19 Bob Marley 18 Freddie Mercury 17 Tina Turner 16 Mick Jagger 15 Robert Plant 14 Al Green 13 Roy Orbison 12 Little Richard 11 Paul McCartney 10 James Brown 09 Stevie Wonder 08 Otis Redding 07 Bob Dylan 06 Marvin Gaye 05 John Lennon 04 Sam Cooke 03 Elvis Presley 02 Ray Charles 01 Aretha Franklin P.S. Robert has written a whole essay on Elvis for the RS feature. Not surprisingly, it's really good: http://www.rollingstone.com/news/coverstory/24161972/page/3 I don't want to read too much into Robert's essay, but could this part where he's writing about the older Elvis be telling of his current situation with his old band mates - "By then, because of the forces around him, it was difficult for him to stretch out with more contemporary songwriters. When he died, he was 42. I'm 18 years older than that now. But he didn't have many fresh liaisons to draw on — his old pals weren't going to bring him the new gospel. I know he wanted to express more. But what he did was he made it possible for me, as a singer, to become otherworldly." P.S.S. One mo' thing then I'll shut up: just wanted to include the lovely (and kinda flirty) words of praise Alison Krauss has for ... Paul Rodgers, " His voice is so tough and so masculine," says Alison Krauss, who grew up a big fan of Paul Rodgers, "he might as well be standing there with a gun while he's singing." With his throaty, impeccably controlled roar, Rodgers was born to sing over big guitars — which he did again and again, most notably with pioneering rockers Free and the Seventies hitmaking machine Bad Company. From "All Right Now" to "Can't Get Enough," his combination of macho blues power and melodic sensitivity still sets the standard for hard-rock frontmen. Rodgers was idolized by the late Freddie Mercury (whom he is now replacing in Queen) and Lynyrd Skynyrd's Ronnie Van Zant. "The sound of his voice represents a whole kind of man to me," says Krauss. "Incredibly masculine, sexy, hardworking." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mernie Posted November 13, 2008 Share Posted November 13, 2008 P.S.S. One mo' thing then I'll shut up: just wanted to include the lovely (and kinda flirty) words of praise Alison Krauss has for ... Paul Rodgers, " His voice is so tough and so masculine," says Alison Krauss, who grew up a big fan of Paul Rodgers, "he might as well be standing there with a gun while he's singing." With his throaty, impeccably controlled roar, Rodgers was born to sing over big guitars — which he did again and again, most notably with pioneering rockers Free and the Seventies hitmaking machine Bad Company. From "All Right Now" to "Can't Get Enough," his combination of macho blues power and melodic sensitivity still sets the standard for hard-rock frontmen. Rodgers was idolized by the late Freddie Mercury (whom he is now replacing in Queen) and Lynyrd Skynyrd's Ronnie Van Zant. "The sound of his voice represents a whole kind of man to me," says Krauss. "Incredibly masculine, sexy, hardworking." Great words from Alison on Paul Rodgers. I've always loved Paul's powerful voice. Hard to understand why he only came in at #55. And Neil Young is at #37! There are quite a few people on this list who are amazing songwriters/musicians but really don't sing all that well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr E Posted November 13, 2008 Share Posted November 13, 2008 It's a nice varied list. Steve Marriott should have been included though. In fact he should be in the top 10! I like Alison Krauss's comments too and totally agree about Paul Rodgers. That's why I don't think he quite works with Queen, his vocals are just too cool and masculine for Queen's camp back catalogue. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
59LesPaul Posted November 13, 2008 Share Posted November 13, 2008 That's why I don't think he quite works with Queen, his vocals are just too cool and masculine for Queen's camp back catalogue. Betcha he does a great version of "Fat Bottomed Girls" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chicago Posted November 13, 2008 Share Posted November 13, 2008 I don't want to read too much into Robert's essay, but could this part where he's writing about the older Elvis be telling of his current situation with his old band mates - "By then, because of the forces around him, it was difficult for him to stretch out with more contemporary songwriters. When he died, he was 42. I'm 18 years older than that now. But he didn't have many fresh liaisons to draw on — his old pals weren't going to bring him the new gospel. I know he wanted to express more. But what he did was he made it possible for me, as a singer, to become otherworldly." ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Elvis never wrote his own material and really never had a musical foil in the studio or onstage. He was always Elvis in a singular way and never part of a famous group. I don't see the parallel to Robert's scenario in relation to Jimmy and the others. Other than a brief era of Page/Plant, Plant's been doing as he's wished for 28 years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
040879 Posted November 13, 2008 Share Posted November 13, 2008 I saw the full list on the Rolling Stone website earlier today. One thing that struck me as I read some of the endorsement comments by other singers was that considerations of technique and range don't seem that significant when singers assess their favourites. Chris Cornell,Iggy Pop and Van Morrison all indicate that their choices[Jeff Buckley,James Brown and Sam Cooke respectively] somehow transcend or bypass or overcome 'mere' technical issues with something that would seem to be almost indefinable.A mix of personality,will, bravery,commitment and soul comes close to summing it up. Cornell acknowledges Buckley's formidable technical ability but makes it clear-as the others do for their choices,especially Sam Cooke- that this alone is nowhere near enough. I found this interesting in that many music fans seem to rate singers on a 'technical' scale and yet the singers themselves seem to give other ideas more emphasis. Oh-where's Tim Buckley? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SunChild Posted November 13, 2008 Share Posted November 13, 2008 Bob Dylan at #7 and Robert Plant at #15 does NOT make sense. But it is an interesting poll because of the people who did the voting. It does to me. I think Bono hit the nail right on the head... before Dylan, it was about "pretty" voices, technically good voices. After Dylan, it was about REAL, individual voices. If you don't think the impact of that on Rock was huge, you are not paying attention (or else you're really young). Plant is a great singer, but his voice is so singular, he didn't have near the same impact on how other singers perform, if you see what I mean. Well, other than David Coverdale. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
040879 Posted November 13, 2008 Share Posted November 13, 2008 Bono's just wrong,as he so often is.Plausible but wrong. Howling Wolf ,Muddy Waters, Elvis,Little Richard,Robert Johnson,to name just a few -none of these are 'pretty' singers. All of them are as idiosyncratc and individualistic as Dylan. Importantly,they were exhibiting these qualities before Dylan and without his influence.Bono may not personally have heard any of them before Dylan but that doesn't make Dylan their precursor. A neat bit of rewriting of history to make the world fit his personal experience maybe? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SunChild Posted November 13, 2008 Share Posted November 13, 2008 Definitely, agree with you. No doubt Robert should be number one. Dylan as a singer no. But musically and lyrically Zimm should be right near the top. I do think Freddy Mercury belongs up there as well and somehow was ommitted. Let's see what the real fans here want, even though this the Official Led Zeppelin Forum. Forget the shoddy Rolling Stone poll, here's the real one! Who do you think are the top 5 singers of the Rock 'N'Roll Era? In no particular order... Elvis Lennon + McCartney Aretha Janis Joplin (&, since this is the Zep site...) Robert Plant That's top singers... not necessarily most influential, since this is a contradiction to what I just posted about Dylan... But I never fail to go, WOW, when I hear these people sing. For the Lennon nay-sayers, as a young man he could rock it! "Twist and Shout" to "Imagine" is a hell of a long way... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SunChild Posted November 13, 2008 Share Posted November 13, 2008 Bono's just wrong,as he so often is.Plausible but wrong. Howling Wolf ,Muddy Waters, Elvis,Little Richard,Robert Johnson,to name just a few -none of these are 'pretty' singers. All of them are as idiosyncratc and individualistic as Dylan. Importantly,they were exhibiting these qualities before Dylan and without his influence.Bono may not personally have heard any of them before Dylan but that doesn't make Dylan their precursor. A neat bit of rewriting of history to make the world fit his personal experience maybe? I appreciate what you're saying, but although these people certainly did have those same qualities, they didn't have the wide-spread, main stream success Dylan did. All those people impacted our favorite musicians quite a bit, obviously blues-based rock sprang from there. But Dylan paved the way for a gruff voice, a personal voice, to be succesful in the larger world, well beyond those genres. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
040879 Posted November 13, 2008 Share Posted November 13, 2008 I'm not sure what "The Rock and Roll era" is, when it is or was and who or what it includes and why or how but....excluding Robert Plant because he'll get loads of mentions here and it can be taken as read that he's one of my All Time Top 5, here goes NO PARTICULAR ORDER-Joni Mitchell,James Brown,Jeff Buckley,Thom Yorke and Marvin Gaye. Those are my faves at 22.29 13 Nov 08. Tomorrow at this time they'll be different... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Melanie_72 Posted November 13, 2008 Share Posted November 13, 2008 Kiss of Fire (GREAT handle) has linked to Mr. Plant's write up, whereby you can click for the complete list. The lazy amongst you can simply read on: 100 Mary J. Blige 99 Steven Tyler 98 Stevie Nicks 97 Joe Cocker 96 B.B. King 95 Patti LaBelle 94 Karen Carpenter 93 Annie Lennox 92 Morrissey 91 Levon Helm 90 The Everly Brothers 89 Solomon Burke 88 Willie Nelson 87 Don Henley 86 Art Garfunkel 85 Sam Moore 84 Darlene Love 83 Patti Smith 82 Tom Waits 81 John Lee Hooker 80 Frankie Valli 79 Mariah Carey 78 Sly Stone 77 Merle Haggard 76 Steve Perry 75 Iggy Pop 74 James Taylor 73 Dolly Parton 72 John Fogerty 71 Toots Hibbert 70 Gregg Allman 69 Ronnie Spector 68 Wilson Pickett 67 Jerry Lee Lewis 66 Thom Yorke 65 David Ruffin 64 Axl Rose 63 Dion 62 Lou Reed 61 Roger Daltrey 60 Björk 59 Rod Stewart 58 Christina Aguilera 57 Eric Burdon 56 Mavis Staples 55 Paul Rodgers 54 Luther Vandross 53 Muddy Waters 52 Brian Wilson 51 Gladys Knight 50 Bonnie Raitt 49 Donny Hathaway 48 Buddy Holly 47 Jim Morrison 46 Patsy Cline 45 Kurt Cobain 44 Bobby "Blue" Bland 43 George Jones 42 Joni Mitchell 41 Chuck Berry 40 Curtis Mayfield 39 Jeff Buckley 38 Elton John 37 Neil Young 36 Bruce Springsteen 35 Dusty Springfield 34 Whitney Houston 33 Steve Winwood 32 Bono 31 Howlin' Wolf 30 Prince 29 Nina Simone 28 Janis Joplin 27 Hank Williams (Sr.) 26 Jackie Wilson 25 Michael Jackson 24 Van Morrison 23 David Bowie 22 Etta James 21 Johnny Cash 20 Smokey Robinson 19 Bob Marley 18 Freddie Mercury 17 Tina Turner 16 Mick Jagger 15 Robert Plant 14 Al Green 13 Roy Orbison 12 Little Richard 11 Paul McCartney 10 James Brown 09 Stevie Wonder 08 Otis Redding 07 Bob Dylan 06 Marvin Gaye 05 John Lennon 04 Sam Cooke 03 Elvis Presley 02 Ray Charles 01 Aretha Franklin P.S. Robert has written a whole essay on Elvis for the RS feature. Not surprisingly, it's really good: http://www.rollingstone.com/news/coverstory/24161972/page/3 I don't want to read too much into Robert's essay, but could this part where he's writing about the older Elvis be telling of his current situation with his old band mates - "By then, because of the forces around him, it was difficult for him to stretch out with more contemporary songwriters. When he died, he was 42. I'm 18 years older than that now. But he didn't have many fresh liaisons to draw on — his old pals weren't going to bring him the new gospel. I know he wanted to express more. But what he did was he made it possible for me, as a singer, to become otherworldly." P.S.S. One mo' thing then I'll shut up: just wanted to include the lovely (and kinda flirty) words of praise Alison Krauss has for ... Paul Rodgers, " His voice is so tough and so masculine," says Alison Krauss, who grew up a big fan of Paul Rodgers, "he might as well be standing there with a gun while he's singing." With his throaty, impeccably controlled roar, Rodgers was born to sing over big guitars — which he did again and again, most notably with pioneering rockers Free and the Seventies hitmaking machine Bad Company. From "All Right Now" to "Can't Get Enough," his combination of macho blues power and melodic sensitivity still sets the standard for hard-rock frontmen. Rodgers was idolized by the late Freddie Mercury (whom he is now replacing in Queen) and Lynyrd Skynyrd's Ronnie Van Zant. "The sound of his voice represents a whole kind of man to me," says Krauss. "Incredibly masculine, sexy, hardworking." This is a great mixture of singers I think. It is nice to see the variety of genres represented. I also like Alison's comments about Paul. She's so cool! (There are already a couple of country artists on the list and me thinks Alison should have made it on as well!)As usual there are some more people that were left off that I think should've been on there but , this list is fun to read I must admit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rorer714 Posted November 14, 2008 Share Posted November 14, 2008 "I just got your letter baby, too bad you can't come home I swear I'm goin' crazy Sittin' here all alone Since your gone I got a mess of blues I ain't slept a wink since Sunday I can't eat a thing all day Every day is just blue Monday Since you've been away Since you're gone I got a mess of blues Whops there goes a teardrop Rolling down my face If you cry when your in love It sure ain't no disgrace I gotta get myself together Before I lose my mind I'm gonna catch the next trian goin' And leave my blues behind Since you're gone I got a mess of blues" Robert can't escape his roots...and he shouldn't! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EpicForest Posted November 14, 2008 Share Posted November 14, 2008 Sure there are alot of good singers but they're all POPULAR!! Boring in a way. I rarely see obscure artists on these top 50 or 100 lists of anything. It's like the criteria is, So long as you have enough hit material that you'll be known by the majority of readers can you be on this list. Oh well, I expect that from any mainstream type of magazine survey/list. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rorer714 Posted November 14, 2008 Share Posted November 14, 2008 Sure there are alot of good singers but they're all POPULAR!! Boring in a way. I rarely see obscure artists on these top 50 or 100 lists of anything. It's like the criteria is, So long as you have enough hit material that you'll be known by the majority of readers can you be on this list. Oh well, I expect that from any mainstream type of magazine survey/list. Well maybe you should go underground and dig for those obscure artists and put it in an underground magazine.Make us a top 100. Most people hear what's put in front of them,not underneath them.Hence the lists! You are being a bit condescending.You can't escape your demeanor! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EpicForest Posted November 14, 2008 Share Posted November 14, 2008 Well maybe you should go underground and dig for those obscure artists and put it in an underground magazine.Make us a top 100. Most people hear what's put in front of them,not underneath them.Hence the lists! You are being a bit condescending.You can't escape your demeanor! Hey...my opinion is that most lists of the kind are boring. If that's seen as condescending so be it. If I put a 100 list out, so many would be so obscure, a vast majority would overlook it and not take much interest. Hence the reason such POPULAR artists are usually on these lists. I agree about what's put IN FRONT of people. Kinda like "spoonfed". I think you're being just as condescending there. But it's true. So wow, maybe my opinion has validity too. My tastes DO go past the top 40 FM hits of the past. I think several here may feel that way as well. It's a BIG world out there and what's "put in front" of someone's ears is such a tiny portion of what's out there. This list represents that to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rorer714 Posted November 14, 2008 Share Posted November 14, 2008 Hey...my opinion is that most lists of the kind are boring. If that's seen as condescending so be it. If I put a 100 list out, so many would be so obscure, a vast majority would overlook it and not take much interest. Hence the reason such POPULAR artists are usually on these lists. I agree about what's put IN FRONT of people. Kinda like "spoonfed". I think you're being just as condescending there. But it's true. So wow, maybe my opinion has validity too. My tastes DO go past the top 40 FM hits of the past. I think several here may feel that way as well. It's a BIG world out there and what's "put in front" of someone's ears is such a tiny portion of what's out there. This list represents that to me. My tastes go way past the top 40 hits of the past too.But you can't say that at least 90% of that list weren't great.Most of them were put in front of you for that reason. The list doesn't take away any of the validity of those obscure people in my book, or yours,I'm sure.The lists are subjective and I think the matter of importance relies on the maker. Your list may have 5 people that agree with you and theirs probably have 95 that will agree with them.Theirs is fun to look at.Yours isn't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EpicForest Posted November 14, 2008 Share Posted November 14, 2008 My tastes go way past the top 40 hits of the past too.But you can't say that at least 90% of that list weren't great.Most of them were put in front of you for that reason. The list doesn't take away any of the validity of those obscure people in my book, or yours,I'm sure.The lists are subjective and I think the matter of importance relies on the maker. Your list may have 5 people that agree with you and theirs probably have 95 that will agree with them.Theirs is fun to look at.Yours isn't. Mine may not be "fun to look at" because of the unknown quantity. That's a general pattern, again reflected in the popularity of such artists on these lists. And just think, if people heard alot of what they might be missing they might sing a different tune. But I doubt you would, you've already CLOSED your mind and ears to it in your statement. Very narrow. I hadn't gotten personal with this but your statement takes it to that level. Shame on you and your condescending personal touch. Yeah, look at the maker, Rolling Stone Magazine Is that not correct. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rorer714 Posted November 14, 2008 Share Posted November 14, 2008 Mine may not be "fun to look at" because of the unknown quantity. That's a general pattern, again reflected in the popularity of such artists on these lists. And just think, if people heard alot of what they might be missing they might sing a different tune. But I doubt you would, you've already CLOSED your mind and ears to it in your statement. Very narrow. I hadn't gotten personal with this but your statement takes it to that level. Shame on you and your condescending personal touch. Yeah, look at the maker, Rolling Stone Magazine Is that not correct. I listen to everything from Jazz to funk to the blues to The Clancy Brothers to the Limeliters to Louis Prima to The Kingston Trio to Roger Miller to Buck Owens to Roy Clark to Al Dimeola to Jaco Pastorius to Stanley Clarke and on and on and on.I have no shame and nothing to be ashamed of.You are still patronizing me and countless others with your "obscure musician superiority" Let's see,the list should have come from Circus?Creem?Billboard?Playboy?People?Time? I dispute some folks on there but the cream of the crop are there.Correct? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EpicForest Posted November 14, 2008 Share Posted November 14, 2008 I listen to everything from Jazz to funk to the blues to The Clancy Brothers to the Limeliters to Louis Prima to The Kingston Trio to Roger Miller to Buck Owens to Roy Clark to Al Dimeola to Jaco Pastorius to Stanley Clarke and on and on and on.I have no shame and nothing to be ashamed of.You are still patronizing me and countless others with your "obscure musician superiority" Let's see,the list should have come from Circus?Creem?Billboard?Playboy?People?Time? I dispute some folks on there but the cream of the crop are there.Correct? Mine was a general statement of the populace not just this board. YOU took it on yourself to take and MAKE it personal. YOU patronized me first. I have no dispute with you personally in this and don't doubt your musical tastes. I stand by my posts. Sure, there's a 'cream of the crop' among POPULAR rocknroll era singers. And YES, I do like a great many of them, but it only scratches the surface and personally I have many more favorites I like better that aren't listed. They aren't necessarily artists that a "put in front of your face". They must be sought out. I wouldn't give much creedence to the other magazines you listed here for a top 100. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elvis56 Posted November 14, 2008 Share Posted November 14, 2008 In rock music there are only two innovators as I see it, 1 ELVIS PRESLEY 2 ROBERT PLANT Who else inspired generations of imitators? Coverdale? I think not. How many "I do too" have there been... While there are certainly talented vocalists out there I can only really boil it down to two who have had the greatest impact and created a whole look, sound and style. That's who they were, no posers please. There is no replacement for Robert Plant. There is no replacement for Elvis. Everyone else...bow down before the Gods of rock vocals. Okay-Robert Johnson...you can stand up!!! Oh yes and another thing, there is no Led without Robert, he was meant to be...so it was and is. Ever Onward. Thank ya...thank ya very mush....Train I ride... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mernie Posted November 14, 2008 Share Posted November 14, 2008 It does to me. I think Bono hit the nail right on the head... before Dylan, it was about "pretty" voices, technically good voices. After Dylan, it was about REAL, individual voices. If you don't think the impact of that on Rock was huge, you are not paying attention (or else you're really young). Plant is a great singer, but his voice is so singular, he didn't have near the same impact on how other singers perform, if you see what I mean. Well, other than David Coverdale. Sorry, I happen to like technically good voices. It doesn't have to be all about technique, but it is important to me. It's what my ear likes to hear. Maybe your ear likes something different. To each his/her own. Of course Dylan was a huge impact. He's an incredible musician and songwriter. He's unique and one-of-a-kind. I just don't happen to be crazy about his voice. I have always paid attention, and no, I'm not really young. I saw Zeppelin live if that gives you a general idea of my generation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rorer714 Posted November 15, 2008 Share Posted November 15, 2008 Mine was a general statement of the populace not just this board. YOU took it on yourself to take and MAKE it personal. YOU patronized me first. I have no dispute with you personally in this and don't doubt your musical tastes. I stand by my posts. Sure, there's a 'cream of the crop' among POPULAR rocknroll era singers. And YES, I do like a great many of them, but it only scratches the surface and personally I have many more favorites I like better that aren't listed. They aren't necessarily artists that a "put in front of your face". They must be sought out. I wouldn't give much creedence to the other magazines you listed here for a top 100. Your original post had a certain snobbery to it. I counted about 13 names on that list that were probably obscure to most folks and if they wanted to know about them, they probably googled them.It didn't necessarily or specifically say "rocknroll".It says 100 BEST singers of all time. I'm guessing you're someone who lives on the run from the IRS(lower section post) because of a trust fund/inheritence and probably lives in a coffee house internet room and has nothing better to do than spew their musical insight to impress young people, is where you're at.Tell me I'm wrong.Pay your taxes and grow up already.Old man! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EpicForest Posted November 15, 2008 Share Posted November 15, 2008 Your original post had a certain snobbery to it. I counted about 13 names on that list that were probably obscure to most folks and if they wanted to know about them, they probably googled them.It didn't necessarily or specifically say "rocknroll".It says 100 BEST singers of all time. I'm guessing you're someone who lives on the run from the IRS(lower section post) because of a trust fund/inheritence and probably lives in a coffee house internet room and has nothing better to do than spew their musical insight to impress young people, is where you're at.Tell me I'm wrong.Pay your taxes and grow up already.Old man! Wow, you sure turned this into a personal thing, hey asshole ! You can guess all you want about my lifestyle, but I don't need to impress anyone and have no intention of that. You make some pretty ridiculous assumptions you have no idea about. You take a post I generalize on as YOUR OWN, and make attacks. What a dick ! Fuck you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.