stanlove Posted February 2, 2015 Share Posted February 2, 2015 Well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Walter Posted February 2, 2015 Share Posted February 2, 2015 Sell more records + have bigger attendance at concerts = Bigger band of the 70's It's a Zeppelin sweep! Plus look at all the influence they had on future groups, the record industry, and concert promotion. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sathington Willoughby Posted February 2, 2015 Share Posted February 2, 2015 Didn't you just start another thread on this exact topic? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteveAJones Posted February 2, 2015 Share Posted February 2, 2015 Led Zeppelin was clearly THE biggest live rock attraction of the 1970s. My reason for saying so is that despite having toured the US extensively in 70, 71, 72, 73, 75 & 77 the demand was such that they could have also easily toured there in 74, 76, 78 & 79. During this same time the Stones maintained a business plan (so to speak) begun in 1966 of touring the US every three years (66, 69, 72, 75, & 78 & 81). The Stones were an incredible attraction however I don't think they could have toured profitably every year such as Led Zeppelin could have done. In fact, I'd say it was Kiss who gave Led Zeppelin and all others a run for their money as the #1 live rock attraction in the world from '77-'79. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
apantherfrommd Posted February 2, 2015 Share Posted February 2, 2015 Didn't you just start another thread on this exact topic? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sathington Willoughby Posted February 2, 2015 Share Posted February 2, 2015 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
badgeholder Posted February 3, 2015 Share Posted February 3, 2015 Kiss? I bought tickets AT THE DOOR for their "Rock & Roll Over" show at the Forum, so they couldn't even sell out one night there. Jethro Tull and Elton John, however, both sold out several nights at the Forum, but not SIX like Zeppelin did. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteveAJones Posted February 3, 2015 Share Posted February 3, 2015 Kiss? I bought tickets AT THE DOOR for their "Rock & Roll Over" show at the Forum, so they couldn't even sell out one night there. Jethro Tull and Elton John, however, both sold out several nights at the Forum, but not SIX like Zeppelin did. I don't show they played California on that tour (1976-77), but that was a 70 DATE tour and they did play three nights at the LA Forum on the Love Gun tour in '77. They also played Japan for first time in '77, playing four sold out nights at the Budokan in Tokyo, breaking the previous attendance record held by the Beatles. They broke their own record by playing five nights there on the Alive II tour in '78. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kayley10 Posted February 3, 2015 Share Posted February 3, 2015 Zeppelin! D'oh... [rubbing it in]Obviously the biggest, the best, the most influential band ever to grace the world with it's presence.[/rubbing it in] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
badgeholder Posted February 3, 2015 Share Posted February 3, 2015 I don't show they played California on that tour (1976-77), but that was a 70 DATE tour and they did play three nights at the LA Forum on the Love Gun tour in '77. They also played Japan for first time in '77, playing four sold out nights at the Budokan in Tokyo, breaking the previous attendance record held by the Beatles. They broke their own record by playing five nights there on the Alive II tour in '78. No doubt, this was their peak era ( KISS ) Maybe I attended the 3rd show of three or something, I don't recall. Of course, then Neil Diamond proceeded to play TEN nights at the Forum, blowing all other records out of the water as far as that went Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strider Posted February 4, 2015 Share Posted February 4, 2015 (edited) Led Zeppelin was clearly THE biggest live rock attraction of the 1970s. My reason for saying so is that despite having toured the US extensively in 70, 71, 72, 73, 75 & 77 the demand was such that they could have also easily toured there in 74, 76, 78 & 79. During this same time the Stones maintained a business plan (so to speak) begun in 1966 of touring the US every three years (66, 69, 72, 75, & 78 & 81). The Stones were an incredible attraction however I don't think they could have toured profitably every year such as Led Zeppelin could have done. In fact, I'd say it was Kiss who gave Led Zeppelin and all others a run for their money as the #1 live rock attraction in the world from '77-'79. Sorry, you're out of your mind if you think KISS was bigger than the Rolling Stones, let alone rivaling Led Zeppelin. badgeholder is right, you could get tickets at the walk up for the Kiss Forum shows. The Kiss revisionist history has gotten out of fucking control over the past couple of decades. They were nowhere near as big as they make themselves out to be. One thing they did lead the industry in was unnecessary "holdover dates". Their only real "hit" album was "Kiss Alive". By the time of "Kiss Alive II" they were already on the downward spiral, as the number of copies that soon flooded the cut-out bins made plain. Led Zeppelin and the Rolling Stones were both huge concert attractions...they were 1A and 1B essentially, that's how close they were. Where Led Zeppelin overtook the Rolling Stones in being the BIGGEST band of the 70s is in their album sales along with their concert sales. That's where the Stones lagged behind Led Zeppelin, although they still received plenty of radio airplay and in fact, were far more popular than Led Zeppelin on AM radio. As someone who was there and actively going to concerts in the 1970s, here is a list of at least 10 bands/artists bigger than KIss in the 1970s: 1. Led Zeppelin 2. Rolling Stones 3. Pink Floyd 4. Elton John 5. The Who 6. The Eagles 7. Fleetwood Mac 8. Neil Diamond 9. ZZ Top 10. Aerosmith Edited February 4, 2015 by Strider Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteveAJones Posted February 4, 2015 Share Posted February 4, 2015 (edited) Sorry, you're out of your mind if you think KISS was bigger than the Rolling Stones, let alone rivaling Led Zeppelin. As I stated, from 1977 to 1979 (and arguably 1975 to 1979) KISS was the #1 live rock attraction in the world. During this time, KISS played more than four times as many shows as The Stones and sold more than twice as many live albums as Led Zeppelin. Tour Dates (1975-1979): Kiss...457 shows Rolling Stones...113 shows Led Zeppelin...88 shows Live Album RIAA Certified Sales Figures: Kiss, Alive (1975) 6,000,000 Kiss, Alive II (1977) 3,500,000 Led Zeppelin, TSRTS (1976) 4,000,000 Rolling Stones, Love You Live (1978) 500,000 Edited February 4, 2015 by SteveAJones Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nutrocker Posted February 5, 2015 Share Posted February 5, 2015 As I stated, from 1977 to 1979 (and arguably 1975 to 1979) KISS was the #1 live rock attraction in the world. During this time, KISS played more than four times as many shows as The Stones and sold more than twice as many live albums as Led Zeppelin. Which only goes to show there's no accounting for taste On a purely musical basis -never mind talent, or lack thereof- fuckin' Kiss don't even deserve to be mentioned in the same goddamn sentence as Zeppelin, or the Stones! Paul Stanley isn't even worthy of wiping the finger gunk off of Page or Keith's guitar strings... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteveAJones Posted February 6, 2015 Share Posted February 6, 2015 On a purely musical basis - never mind talent, or lack thereof - fuckin' Kiss don't even deserve to be mentioned in the same goddamn sentence as Zeppelin, or the Stones! Paul Stanley isn't even worthy of wiping the finger gunk off of Page or Keith's guitar strings... Personally, I think Paul Stanley is one of the greatest front men in rock history. He's over 60 now yet still putting entertainers a third of his age to shame. Aside from that, he's just an all around great guy. I can't wait to see him perform at the Tokyo Dome next month. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the chase Posted February 6, 2015 Share Posted February 6, 2015 (edited) They were all pretty damn big. To compare Zeppelin and Kiss from 75-79 is kind of pointless. Led Zeppelin were largely inactive for reasons we all know. 3 Dog Night were selling out stadiums in the 70s. David Cassidy was as well. Edited February 6, 2015 by the chase Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pagesbow Posted February 7, 2015 Share Posted February 7, 2015 (edited) Sorry, you're out of your mind if you think KISS was bigger than the Rolling Stones, let alone rivaling Led Zeppelin. badgeholder is right, you could get tickets at the walk up for the Kiss Forum shows. The Kiss revisionist history has gotten out of fucking control over the past couple of decades. They were nowhere near as big as they make themselves out to be. One thing they did lead the industry in was unnecessary "holdover dates". Their only real "hit" album was "Kiss Alive". By the time of "Kiss Alive II" they were already on the downward spiral, as the number of copies that soon flooded the cut-out bins made plain. Led Zeppelin and the Rolling Stones were both huge concert attractions...they were 1A and 1B essentially, that's how close they were. Where Led Zeppelin overtook the Rolling Stones in being the BIGGEST band of the 70s is in their album sales along with their concert sales. That's where the Stones lagged behind Led Zeppelin, although they still received plenty of radio airplay and in fact, were far more popular than Led Zeppelin on AM radio. As someone who was there and actively going to concerts in the 1970s, here is a list of at least 10 bands/artists bigger than KIss in the 1970s: 1. Led Zeppelin 2. Rolling Stones 3. Pink Floyd 4. Elton John 5. The Who 6. The Eagles 7. Fleetwood Mac 8. Neil Diamond 9. ZZ Top 10. Aerosmith ....and I would argue ABBA and Queen were bigger live attractions than PISS in the 70's (overall) I think one could safely say Zeppelin owned North America for most of the 70's. That was Zeppelin's biggest market; they sold the bulk of their records there and played the majority of their shows in North America. The Rolling Stones were most probably a bigger draw in the U.K, parts of Europe and Australasia (though I don't have any empirical data at hand to back this up) so surely a distinction has to be made between North America and worldwide. Edited February 7, 2015 by Pagesbow Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteveAJones Posted February 7, 2015 Share Posted February 7, 2015 To compare Zeppelin and Kiss from 75-79 is kind of pointless. Not when the question is who was the biggest live rock attraction of the '70s. I think I've proven Kiss ruled (as they used to say) from '75-'79 and that ain't revisionist it's a fact. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteveAJones Posted February 7, 2015 Share Posted February 7, 2015 (edited) ....and I would argue ABBA and Queen were bigger live attractions than PISS in the 70's (overall) ABBA was a bigger live rock attraction than Kiss? That's what we're discussing here - rock acts, not Tony Orlando & Dawn's chart mates - I don't consider ABBA to be a live ROCK act. They were a family friendly pop band who spent half the decade playing Swedish folkparks. Hell, even if they are considered a rock act they didn't perform a show in the United States until '79. Get real. Queen? They played less than 100 shows in North America from '75-'79. Anyway, I never said Kiss ruled the 1970s, I said from '75-'79. THAT is the era of Kiss dominance. Edited February 7, 2015 by SteveAJones Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteveAJones Posted February 7, 2015 Share Posted February 7, 2015 ABBA? QUEEN? or take your dresses off (girls AND boys) and go see Kiss: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pagesbow Posted February 8, 2015 Share Posted February 8, 2015 (edited) ABBA was a bigger live rock attraction than Kiss? That's what we're discussing here - rock acts, not Tony Orlando & Dawn's chart mates - I don't consider ABBA to be a live ROCK act. They were a family friendly pop band who spent half the decade playing Swedish folkparks. Hell, even if they are considered a rock act they didn't perform a show in the United States until '79. Get real. Queen? They played less than 100 shows in North America from '75-'79. Anyway, I never said Kiss ruled the 1970s, I said from '75-'79. THAT is the era of Kiss dominance. No, that's what you're discussing as, if we're being pedantic, may I mention that the thread is titled: Bigger Live Attraction in the 70s The Stones or Zeppelin? Started by stanlove Not: Biggest Live Rock Attraction in the 70s In North America Started by SteveAJones However, feel free to start that thread. My reply was to strider's post "here is a list of at least 10 bands/artists bigger than KIss in the 1970s" (note he doesn't use the word rock) also, at number eight in his list, he has bloody Neil Diamond for god's sake, whom I presume you consider rock seeing as you didn't admonish strider over Neil Diamond being included in your discussion about rock acts. Yes, ABBA are easy to dismiss, yes they are uncool and naff, however, they wrote some of the greatest pop songs of all time. I happen to respect them as songwriters and for the fact that they have refused to reform. Unlike....... PISS? Jesus.....just look at them. Edited February 8, 2015 by Pagesbow Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlackDog71 Posted February 8, 2015 Share Posted February 8, 2015 This one is a Zeppelin no doubter. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteveAJones Posted February 8, 2015 Share Posted February 8, 2015 PISS? Jesus.....just look at them. Whatever you say, Dancing Queen. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Badgeholder Still Posted February 8, 2015 Share Posted February 8, 2015 "Abba? Abba? Swedish? I knew them when they were a Lancaster club-dancing trio" Although it pains me to agree with SAJ on anything, it's really not fair to compare Zep and The Stones as attractions in the 70's. It's easier to point out the differences than to compare the similarities. Going back to the sixties, The Stones have always been a part of American mainstream culture. They were a hit machine in the 60's and the 70's, on the radio, and in the mainstream media. Zeppelin and KISS were never mainstream, especially in the seventies. All three bands surely shared some of the same fanbase, but Zep and Kiss likely had fewer casual fans. So it is a credit to these two that they filled arenas with a limited audience. It does make more sense to compare Zep and KISS or The Stones and The Eagles. The truth is all of these bands sold lots of tickets and albums and were very successful. Any respect due Abba (Abba?), a pop vocal group, is most certainly due the producer. I mean, if you like "Dancing Queen", how can you not dig "I Was Made For Loving You"? It's all music for shakin' yer ass, right? As far as the "I hate KISS" badge of honor hogwash, I've got three words for you: "Whole Lotta Love". A three note riff, barely two chords, cheesy lyrics, and a bunch of sound effects. Who's gimmick free? If you think you're too cool for KISS, you ain't. If you don't like KISS, fine. But of you don't get KISS, you don't get Rock & Roll. Very few bands are more Rock & Roll than KISS. They've been successful doing their thing their way for 40+ years in spite of haters and and a lack of support from the mainstream media (kinda like Zep except for the longevity). I'd say that deserves some respect. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pagefan55 Posted February 8, 2015 Share Posted February 8, 2015 I was a little boy in the late '70's, but I do remember Kiss being a huge fad between about '77 and '79. They didn't compare in quality to Zeppelin and the Stones, though -- not even close. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Badgeholder Still Posted February 8, 2015 Share Posted February 8, 2015 But other than your pretentious personal tastes, what is that conclusion based on? I don't understand how "Duece" is not a R&R classic in the same league as "Satisfaction" or "Communication Breakdown". It has raw, honest energy played by a band with an original sound. How else do you define R&R? Pretty please, with sugar on top, substantiate your claim. Is it really the make-up and flashpots? The Stones used make-up and flashpots. The Stones dabbled in disco. Gimmicks? All three of these bands had gimmicks coming out their asses. What's your actual knowledge of the band and their songs? They're not a great band because you don't like them? That's weak sauce. I bet you can do better. Otherwise you're talking out your ass. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.