chillumpuffer Posted February 1, 2016 Share Posted February 1, 2016 Yeah 30 minutes - never quite eclipsed Montrose's first album which would fit on one side of a C60 with room to spare ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JTM Posted February 1, 2016 Share Posted February 1, 2016 4 minutes ago, chillumpuffer said: Yeah 30 minutes - never quite eclipsed Montrose's first album which would fit on one side of a C60 with room to spare ? I bought that Montrose LP twice, did not realise it was that short timewise. I had a Guitar or two in those days,used to love playing along with "Rock the Nation". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chillumpuffer Posted February 1, 2016 Share Posted February 1, 2016 3 minutes ago, JTM said: I bought that Montrose LP twice, did not realise it was that short timewise. I had a Guitar or two in those days,used to love playing along with "Rock the Nation". I might be being a bit hard there - but it was a short but great album. I've always had a soft spot for Sammy Hagar. I saw him in Manchester @ 78. I think Def Leppard supported him. It was a truly outstanding show. Very, very LOUD Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kiwi_Zep_Fan87 Posted February 1, 2016 Share Posted February 1, 2016 On 1/31/2016 at 8:55 PM, JohnOsbourne said: Caress of Steel is another Rush album that doesn't get the respect it deserves. Hard to call it prog-rock though, although I suppose there are indications of where the band was going in that regard. Yes, there are and it was certainly nice to see the band perfect and develop that style further in albums such as 2112, A Farewell To Kings and Hemispheres! I'm no prog-rock purist or anything, but I do feel that brilliant epics like The Fountain of Lamneth and The Necromancer, are what gives that album its progressive rock elements. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sathington Willoughby Posted February 1, 2016 Share Posted February 1, 2016 15 hours ago, JohnOsbourne said: Tool and Primus are great, but prog-rock? That's stretching the definition a bit, isn't it? No, not really, particularly the albums I posted. Perhaps you should expand your definition of prog-rock, that would be very progressive of you. http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=6052 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=6051 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=8546 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=8548 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kiwi_Zep_Fan87 Posted February 1, 2016 Share Posted February 1, 2016 (edited) 20 minutes ago, Sathington Willoughby said: No, not really, particularly the albums I posted. Perhaps you should expand your definition of prog-rock, that would be very progressive of you. http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=6052 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=6051 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=8546 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=8548 Incredibly interesting site there, Sath!! Thank you for posting that! You don't know how relieved I was, to see Queen listed as one of the artists on that site! I thought that I was the only freakin' person on the planet to consider their very early work as progressive rock and that all the other Queen fans out there, will regard me as some sort of a nut job! *saves link to favourites Edited February 1, 2016 by Kiwi_Zep_Fan87 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kiwi_Zep_Fan87 Posted February 1, 2016 Share Posted February 1, 2016 Right, here are my three most favourite progressive rock albums. I am incorporating the one album per band rule, here. Queen II Caress of Steel The Yes Album Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sathington Willoughby Posted February 1, 2016 Share Posted February 1, 2016 (edited) 34 minutes ago, Kiwi_Zep_Fan87 said: Incredibly interesting site there, Sath!! Thank you for posting that! You don't know how relieved I was, to see Queen listed as one of the artists on that site! I thought that I was the only freakin' person on the planet to consider their very early work as progressive rock and that all the other Queen fans out there, will regard me as some sort of a nut job! *saves link to favourites You're welcome P, it's a really cool site! I've always thought some peoples definition of prog is a bit too stringent, imo that kind of contradicts the term 'progressive'. Edited February 1, 2016 by Sathington Willoughby Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mithril46 Posted February 2, 2016 Share Posted February 2, 2016 Yeah defining prog-rock is particularly difficult from all the stuff in the 70's. There was a band with Pnil Collins on drums, called Brand X, very good but also jazz-fusiony. Gentle Giant was very creative, but like some more abrupt Crimson and Rush, the awkward odd timings eventually grated. Also Kraftwerk from Germany, incredibly innovative, not sounding like any previous band ever, but a totally acquired taste, you may kill the "music" after 10 seconds. From Holland check out Focus, with virtuoso guitarist Jan Akkerman. All these bands have their moments, but referring back, IMO the most organic sounding band in the genre was Yes, one of the few bands in this genre to sell out multiple nights at MSG. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnOsbourne Posted February 2, 2016 Share Posted February 2, 2016 9 hours ago, Sathington Willoughby said: No, not really, particularly the albums I posted. Perhaps you should expand your definition of prog-rock, that would be very progressive of you. http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=6052 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=6051 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=8546 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=8548 Interesting site, but I'm familiar with all four albums, and I tend to agree with one of the commenters on the Lateralus thread: long and complex songs don't necessarily make a band progressive, and the noisiness and aggression (good things IMO) of both bands make it hard to characterize them as progressive. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnOsbourne Posted February 2, 2016 Share Posted February 2, 2016 17 hours ago, Kiwi_Zep_Fan87 said: Excellent post lpman! I couldn't have put it better myself! Songs like The Necromancer and The Fountain of Lamneth are some of my favourite songs of all time! Absolutely, love The Necromancer. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kiwi_Zep_Fan87 Posted February 2, 2016 Share Posted February 2, 2016 (edited) What is Progressive Music? In each and everyday musical conversational exchanges, the mention of the term “progressive rock” or “progressive metal” will result in blank stares that generally lead to the question, “What is progressive music?”. For clarity, I will use the commonly used shortcut term of “prog” to represent the progressive rock and progressive metal genre here. Newcomers to the genre seem to frequently ask this question in prog discussions. More so, each person seems to either add more or less to the definition. I’m not going to write a book here because there is a plethora of prog definitions out there on the internet. I just want to emphasize the basic properties of prog music as my foundation for my hobby here on PRM. As Matthew Rink suggests, way too much emphasis is placed on the idea that the “progressive” adjective suggests, or even requires, that the genre’s music be some sort of ever-evolving entity. “Progressive” is merely a descriptive term by which to classify music with certain qualities, not an instruction that obligates the music to a strict sense of development. All genres of music can have progressive characteristics, but I focus primarily on rock/metal. Progressive Properties 1) Longer songs (or “epics”) 2) Time changes (e.g., odd time signatures) 3) More complex, sophisticated instrumentation and compositions 4) Superior vocals 5) More complex conceptual ideas / Heightened, lyrical content NOTE: I personally want to strongly emphasize number 4 (superior vocals) which I use to make my first assessment of a band (or song). It’s not necessarily my number one criteria for a “passing grade” or “seal of approval”, but it sure helps! 1) Longer songs. Prog bands have a tendency to create long songs (i.e., “epic”) characterized by a combination of greater lyrical content and some very lengthy instrumental passages. These songs will break away from the traditional verse/chorus song structure and will be broken up into different parts or movements. This creates something along the lines of an orchestral suite or an album within an album. 2) Time Changes. One element that can dub a band as “progressive” is the time change or odd-beat characteristic. There is a noticeable difference between the structure of songs with really common beats (e.g., 4/4) and those that use diverse and complicated rhythms and/or switch between beats like 7/4, 11/8, 9/4, free-time, etc. Some people may find certain prog bands hard to “get into”. This usually stems from songs containing less than conventional song structures that require the listener to work a little to follow along. Within a few listens, it usually clicks. 3) More complex instrumentation. The instrumentation is another element that will separate ordinary rock/metal from progressive rock/metal. You will find some type of piano, keyboard, synthesizer, strings (violins, cellos, etc.), flute, tympani, and other more peculiar instruments mixed in with the guitar and drums in a prog band’s repertoire in order to setup the “progressive” sound. Progressive music will tend to have a more classical influence than would be your typical, blues-based rock music. There is a certain higher standard of talent set by many progressive artists. Many prog musicians could be considered virtuosos at their respective positions, usually with both passion and technical ability. I personally coined a descriptive term of “modern classical” to best describe my view of prog rock/metal (and NOT to be confused with “classic rock”) 4) Superior vocals. Another emblematic aspect of prog music (and DEAR TO THIS BROADCASTER’S HEART) is the incredible range and singing ability of many of the genre’s vocalists. Yes, there is a lot of emphasis on the music, but in most cases, you’ll see wonderful vocals in front of the music. Emotional Broadway-style displays, multi-part counterpart vocal melodies, and other layered vocal arrangements and choirs not only deliver a message, but also enhance the music, and become a part of it .5) More complex conceptual ideas / Heightened, lyrical content. Prog artists sometimes undertake massive projects in developing ideas in their songs and albums. As a rule, lyrics in progressive music tend to be of a more sophisticated and intellectual nature – sometimes fantasy-based, sometimes pure original fiction, and sometimes dealing with heartfelt human emotion. Many albums tend to be “concept albums” which is a storyline or theme-based work in which the individual songs on an album all relate to one another to either directly recount a story or to immerse the listener into a more abstract experience. Several Common Sub-Genres of PROG: Ask 100 people what their definition of progressive music is and you’ll probably get 100 different definitions along with multiple sub-genres to confuse you even more! I list the following as the most commonly known sub-genres recognized in prog rock and metal. 1). Progressive rock & progressive metal. These are two major divisions of prog music from which many other categories can be sub-classified. Basically, prog metal will combine elements of heavy metal (such as heavily distorted guitars and fast rhythms) with some or all of those prog traits outlined in the above section, while prog rock combines a less "edgy" (rock / hard rock) sound with those aforementioned characteristics. 2). Symphonic rock - A relatively easy one, symphonic rock lumps together those bands that seem to draw heavily from incorporating orchestral and classical influences into their music. This term is generally seen attached to 70's progressive bands, though it would not be out of the question to label some of today's bands as such. Still, many of the less progressive metal bands that incorporate symphonic elements will less arguably fall into the category of "power metal" (see below). 3). Neo-prog - Generally, neo-prog acts have a very identifiable, keyboard driven sound that seems to have originated with old Genesis. Bands like IQ, Saga, and Arena are the biggest names in neo-prog currently. 4). Art-rock – “Art" is just used primarily as a substitute for "progressive" in most contexts. That said, this term also seems to carry a bit of a tone-downed connotation. That is, many times when a band is being described in this manner, the writer seems to have reservations about classifying the band as a full fledged prog band. This could be more related to the term: "prog-lite". 5). Technical Metal - A term used to describe certain bands that play an especially complex and skilled style of heavy metal music. These bands usually write songs solely for the sake of showcasing the musicians' abilities and expressing creatively and experimentally with music. Often this goes so far as to mean completely abandoning the idea of memorable or emotional song-writing in pursuit of creating stunningly complex material. 6). Neo-classical & Power Metal - For the most part, these two go hand in hand. Neo-classical is actually a sub-genre under power metal, and, as its name suggests, describes bands whose sound is a modern-classical sound. Speedy guitar riffs and solos that may sound more like Mozart or Paganini set the stage, while violins, harpsichords, and choirs give a very convincingly classical edge to the music. Among the most "popular " bands of this nature are Symphony X and Stratovarius. Power metal refers to the genre that speed metal evolved into as bands like Helloween introduced more of a melodic flair and greater variety into the genre. The sound is not necessarily more "powerful" or "louder" in any way, but power metal bands usually have catchier, more anthem-like songs with more fantasy-based subject matter and really strong choruses. Song structure is sometimes is a crescendo around these choruses thus creating a more theatrical, dramatic, and/or emotionally "powerful" sound. This can be quite distinct from progressive metal -- many power metal bands are not really progressive at all, though when they employ symphonic instrumentation or operatic choral effects -- even odd time signatures -- lines between power and progressive metal can become blurred. The bands Symphony X and Angra, for instance, are examples of this type. 7).Fusion, Experimental, Broadway metal & Opera metal, Houston-scene rock, Prog-pop, Doom, AOR, Gothic, Melodic, etc - The list goes on and on and on. As you can see, progressive music can be a very broad term. For ProgRockandMetal, it is my focus to concentrate on those artists I feel meet the criteria of my overall definition for progressive rock/metal and I will refer to this definition often when I decide whether I broadcast a band’s accomplishments. Not all artists will have each property characterized in their music, but I believe you will see at least three of the above list that will make the music progressive. I truly believe what I stream is suitable to all prog fans. Once in a while, I may go outside the boundaries of the definitions either by accident or for some reason I found the music enlightening and artful. I make the final decision on whether a band’s music is streamed over my station or not. I will always assume my listeners enjoy what I stream – nothing more, nothing less, and I base this off the many positive comments/feedback I’ve received over the years. Negative opinions are not solicited nor warranted. If bands do not support my philosophy, feel I’m misrepresenting them, then please notify me and will gladly refrain from streaming your material. BROADCASTER’S SIDE NOTE: I personally do not acknowledge the death metal, growling singing, euphemistically termed as “cookie monster” singing as a part of the definition of “Superior vocals”. I realize there is art in all music, I do not deny this. I have listened to many exceptional bands that the instrumentation is a class act – but once the cookies are introduced, I am totally distracted and cannot concentrate on listening. To me, “cookie monster” singing sounds angry, hateful, and “noisy”. In my opinion, noise is not music. I’ve set this as my standard and will abide by it always. (The majority of the contents of this definition must be credited to Matthew A. Rink’s definition found on www.progpages.com) Source : http://www.progrockandmetal.net/progressive_music_definition.htm Edited February 2, 2016 by Kiwi_Zep_Fan87 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RIP-IT-UP Posted February 2, 2016 Share Posted February 2, 2016 What, no Relayer(!) Most creative album of all time ; I saw G.O.D. live with orchestra-unbelievable. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chef free Posted February 2, 2016 Share Posted February 2, 2016 Modern Prog? The Mars Volta comes to mind. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Charles J. White Posted February 2, 2016 Share Posted February 2, 2016 The Kinks - Do they qualify as Progressive? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sathington Willoughby Posted February 2, 2016 Share Posted February 2, 2016 7 hours ago, Kiwi_Zep_Fan87 said: 1). Progressive rock & progressive metal. These are two major divisions of prog music from which many other categories can be sub-classified. Basically, prog metal will combine elements of heavy metal (such as heavily distorted guitars and fast rhythms) with some or all of those prog traits outlined in the above section, while prog rock combines a less "edgy" (rock / hard rock) sound with those aforementioned characteristics. I think Tool and Primus fit comfortably in the Prog Metal category. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moddey Dhoo Posted February 2, 2016 Share Posted February 2, 2016 Pink Floyd, Genesis are a given, and I like Rush. I guess I was thinking more who were the pioneers? Originators? How about some of the earlier bands like Hawkwind? Or Rare Bird? The first time I listened to 'As Your Mind Flies By' by Rare Bird I was completely hooked on prog rock. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Plantpothead Posted February 3, 2016 Share Posted February 3, 2016 (edited) Barclay James Harvest - and other short stories Greenslade -Bedside manners are extra Pink Floyd - Meddle Yes - Close to the edge Genesis -Foxtrot Little feat -Sailing shoes Steely Dan - Can't buy a thrill Edited February 3, 2016 by Plantpothead Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chillumpuffer Posted February 3, 2016 Share Posted February 3, 2016 7 hours ago, Plantpothead said: Barclay James Harvest - and other short stories Greenslade -Bedside manners are extra Pink Floyd - Meddle Yes - Close to the edge Genesis -Foxtrot Little feat -Sailing shoes Steely Dan - Can't buy a thrill Whilst I agree with the first 5 of your list Joe, but Little Feat - Sailing Shoes? Really? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnOsbourne Posted February 5, 2016 Share Posted February 5, 2016 This may be of interest (the guitarist is no David Gilmore, but cool cover nonetheless): Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sathington Willoughby Posted February 5, 2016 Share Posted February 5, 2016 3 hours ago, JohnOsbourne said: This may be of interest (the guitarist is no David Gilmore, but cool cover nonetheless): Now that's more like it! Try this one, my all-time favorite cover. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.