Pip Posted February 18, 2009 Share Posted February 18, 2009 It wasn't really what I meant, though I understand it sounded that way. Or maybe it was. I think that a more proper name for this thread would be Photoshopped Porn, so your post seems almost off-topic to me (in a good way). Yeah, I agree; though she's fully dressed so I doubt anyone in this thread will notice. I get you. hehehe I think I get you a bit too much - if you know what I mean! we think alike. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Katuschka Posted February 18, 2009 Share Posted February 18, 2009 I get you. hehehe I think I get you a bit too much - if you know what I mean! we think alike. I'm just amazed at the stupidity of those people who drool over pictures that are so retouched they don't look like photographs anymore. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pip Posted February 18, 2009 Share Posted February 18, 2009 I'm just amazed at the stupidity of those people who drool over pictures that are so retouched they don't look like photographs anymore. ... and then they wonder why they don't "get women". Or can't find a "perfect one"... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Katuschka Posted February 18, 2009 Share Posted February 18, 2009 ... and then they wonder why they don't "get women". Or can't find a "perfect one"... Perfect, poreless and independent...someone like Paris Hilton. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pip Posted February 18, 2009 Share Posted February 18, 2009 Perfect, poreless and independent...someone like Paris Hilton. hehe yeah and Paris Hilton isn't even Paris Hilton ... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Black Dawg Posted February 18, 2009 Share Posted February 18, 2009 (edited) hehe yeah and Paris Hilton isn't even Paris Hilton ... Icing Call on you two. Edited February 18, 2009 by Black Dawg Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spats Posted February 18, 2009 Share Posted February 18, 2009 Perfect, poreless and independent...someone like Paris Hilton. When you ladies start dating overweight bald guys or start admiring photos of guys like that then it's fair that you knock what guys find hot. Until then it's sort of hypocritical for you to do that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimmy Jam Posted February 18, 2009 Share Posted February 18, 2009 When you ladies start dating overweight bald guys or start admiring photos of guys like that then it's fair that you knock what guys find hot. Until then it's sort of hypocritical for you to do that. I agree with you spats Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pip Posted February 19, 2009 Share Posted February 19, 2009 When you ladies start dating overweight bald guys or start admiring photos of guys like that then it's fair that you knock what guys find hot. Until then it's sort of hypocritical for you to do that. we are just talking about what we think beauty is... actually we are talking about realism - sometimes what you "guys find hot" doesn't exist - that is all we are saying... You are free to say aything you like on the 'beautiful men' thread but keep in mind that we both posted realistic photos of OUR men there ... (and I added another realistic photo of a man that I think is beautiful for his personality and talent as well as looks - I mean he is a very short man with a large nose - but I think he is beautiful). I can't say anything for the other women but they were having a discussion about a particularily old man being quite beautiful... so no I don't think we two are being Hypocritical. Since we only posted those of real men. BTW if my husband was an "overweight bald guy" (I mean he might be one day who knows?) I wouldn't give a damn - as long as he keeps going downtown I don't care... hehehe for us to be hypocritical we would have to be posting air brushed photos of whatever is considered the fantasy for women ... and we haven't ... so we aren't. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dzldoc Posted February 19, 2009 Share Posted February 19, 2009 we are just talking about what we think beauty is... actually we are talking about realism - sometimes what you "guys find hot" doesn't exist - that is all we are saying... You are free to say aything you like on the 'beautiful men' thread but keep in mind that we both posted realistic photos of OUR men there ... (and I added another realistic photo of a man that I think is beautiful for his personality and talent as well as looks - I mean he is a very short man with a large nose - but I think he is beautiful). I can't say anything for the other women but they were having a discussion about a particularily old man being quite beautiful... so no I don't think we two are being Hypocritical. Since we only posted those of real men. BTW if my husband was an "overweight bald guy" (I mean he might be one day who knows?) I wouldn't give a damn - as long as he keeps going downtown I don't care... hehehe for us to be hypocritical we would have to be posting air brushed photos of whatever is considered the fantasy for women ... and we haven't ... so we aren't. Good one Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Katuschka Posted February 19, 2009 Share Posted February 19, 2009 When you ladies start dating overweight bald guys or start admiring photos of guys like that then it's fair that you knock what guys find hot. Until then it's sort of hypocritical for you to do that. Spats, dear, you completely missed the whole point. Again... The point is that Paris Hilton is not perfect, definitely not poreless, and far from independent. I'm not saying you should start posting pictures of Roseanne Barr. Just pointing at the fact that the majority of the pictures posted in this thread are so far from reality that you could post pictures of female characters from Japanese cartoons and there would be almost no difference. What you find hot is often a work of a skilled retoucher. You analogy is therefore ricidulous and out-of-the-way. I have no problem with admitting that I find my bf trully handsome and that looking at his firm butt turns me on. But the greatest thing about it is that he's real. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manderlyh Posted February 19, 2009 Share Posted February 19, 2009 Good one ROFL That's EXACTLY what I was going to do--quote her and highlight it. FWIW--Pip and I agree on that one. No going downtown is a no-go. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Katuschka Posted February 19, 2009 Share Posted February 19, 2009 FWIW--Pip and I agree on that one. No going downtown is a no-go. Count me in. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Black Dawg Posted February 19, 2009 Share Posted February 19, 2009 Refs rule once more: Delay of Game. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spats Posted February 19, 2009 Share Posted February 19, 2009 we are just talking about what we think beauty is... actually we are talking about realism - sometimes what you "guys find hot" doesn't exist - that is all we are saying... You are free to say aything you like on the 'beautiful men' thread but keep in mind that we both posted realistic photos of OUR men there ... (and I added another realistic photo of a man that I think is beautiful for his personality and talent as well as looks - I mean he is a very short man with a large nose - but I think he is beautiful). I can't say anything for the other women but they were having a discussion about a particularily old man being quite beautiful... so no I don't think we two are being Hypocritical. Since we only posted those of real men. BTW if my husband was an "overweight bald guy" (I mean he might be one day who knows?) I wouldn't give a damn - as long as he keeps going downtown I don't care... hehehe for us to be hypocritical we would have to be posting air brushed photos of whatever is considered the fantasy for women ... and we haven't ... so we aren't. The women in those airbrushed photos are beautiful when they aren't airbrushed. Paris Hilton is hot looking In person. What i find hot and what other guys find hot does exist. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spats Posted February 19, 2009 Share Posted February 19, 2009 Spats, dear, you completely missed the whole point. Again... The point is that Paris Hilton is not perfect, definitely not poreless, and far from independent. I'm not saying you should start posting pictures of Roseanne Barr. Just pointing at the fact that the majority of the pictures posted in this thread are so far from reality that you could post pictures of female characters from Japanese cartoons and there would be almost no difference. What you find hot is often a work of a skilled retoucher. You analogy is therefore ricidulous and out-of-the-way. I have no problem with admitting that I find my bf trully handsome and that looking at his firm butt turns me on. But the greatest thing about it is that he's real. The women in those pics are pretty without being touched up. I would say Paris Hilton is independant. She runs her own business. That is as independant as it gets. She does not depend on men or need to be taken care of by them. She has more money than most of them. No one is saying she is perfect but she is hotter looking than the average woman. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spats Posted February 19, 2009 Share Posted February 19, 2009 Refs rule once more: Delay of Game. Those women are pretty hot. The blonde has a nice body but she should have touched her face up with some makeup because her face is too shiny. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zanadu Posted February 19, 2009 Share Posted February 19, 2009 The women in those airbrushed photos are beautiful when they aren't airbrushed. Paris Hilton is hot looking In person. What i find hot and what other guys find hot does exist. Paris Hilton is a pro-anorexia icon. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Katuschka Posted February 19, 2009 Share Posted February 19, 2009 The women in those pics are pretty without being touched up. Why then do they need to be touched up? I would say Paris Hilton is independant. She runs her own business. That is as independant as it gets. She does not depend on men or need to be taken care of by them. She has more money than most of them. Yeah, I'm sure she would manage to run the same business without being a Hilton. She's definitely never been dependent on her grandpa's money, no never. No one is saying she is perfect but she is hotter looking than the average woman. I disagree. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spats Posted February 19, 2009 Share Posted February 19, 2009 Why then do they need to be touched up? Yeah, I'm sure she would manage to run the same business without being a Hilton. She's definitely never been dependent on her grandpa's money, no never. I disagree. Because that's just how the magazine's are. They want them to look perfect. But they put women on their magazine who you see normally as beautiful and they still touch them up. They touch up Eva mendes and Angelina jolie and Charlize Theron. Women who don't need it. She is not really dependant on his money anymore. Starting out she was. Now she earns her own money. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Babs Posted February 19, 2009 Share Posted February 19, 2009 Because that's just how the magazine's are. They want them to look perfect. But they put women on their magazine who you see normally as beautiful and they still touch them up. They touch up Eva mendes and Angelina jolie and Charlize Theron. Women who don't need it. She is not really dependant on his money anymore. Starting out she was. Now she earns her own money. Would you pay for her movie and popcorn? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spats Posted February 19, 2009 Share Posted February 19, 2009 (edited) Would you pay for her movie and popcorn? She would not need me to. But considering it's her I might make an exception. It's not everyday you get to go out with Paris Hilton. She is not your average every day woman. My buddies would envy the hell out of me instead of me envying them which is how it is usually. Edited February 19, 2009 by spats Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Black Dawg Posted February 19, 2009 Share Posted February 19, 2009 Those women are pretty hot. The blonde has a nice body but she should have touched her face up with some makeup because her face is too shiny. You surely don't get anybody's point. The object is to post pictures not argue about perfection. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nathan Posted February 19, 2009 Share Posted February 19, 2009 She would not need me to. But considering it's her I might make an exception. It's not everyday you get to go out with Paris Hilton. She is not your average every day woman. My buddies would envy the hell out of me instead of me envying them which is how it is usually. She is not your average every day woman? No kidding. She's dumber (and by that I mean stupid) then your average, everyday woman. And, personally, I don't care how pretty she is (although I don't think she has the prettiest face because it's reminiscent of a bull dog, IMO)...because of her personality and the fact that she is the definition of the stereotypical blonde in every way, shape, and form, I wouldn't touch her with a 100-foot poll. I wouldn't be caught dead her, with the exception of photos of her that happen to have me in the background because I happen to be on the same street, and only then because I can't control those. What about Kate Beckinsale? She definitely does not need to be "touched up." This is Kate Beckinsale "natural" (that is, untouched by magazines... although she probably is wearing make-up): Oh, and BTW... the following is Paris Hilton with little make-up and not touched-up: *shudders* Not pretty (sorry). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zepyep Posted February 20, 2009 Share Posted February 20, 2009 Hi all, Can we see photos of good looking broads? K Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.