ninelives Posted January 20, 2009 Share Posted January 20, 2009 The Who are now selling Pepsi: http://www.contactmusic.com/news.nsf/artic...century_1092291 Iggy Pop is selling car insurance: http://www.worldcarfans.com/9090106.008/pu...s-car-insurance That's not the first commercial the Who have licensed their music too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bustle In My Hedgerow Posted January 21, 2009 Share Posted January 21, 2009 I admit, after learning about all the instances that the band has NOT allowed their music to be used (in movies, games, etc) I always thought, 'Why did they allow 'Rock & Roll' to be used in that Cadillac commercial?'... but IMO it was a localized instance.. Maybe the rationale behind it was it being Robert's favorite car.. who knows? I do think they're fairly consistent in keeping the integrity of their music intact, though. Imagine using a LZ song to sell car insurance or diapers or cell phones.. it would be too, no pun intended, commercial. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ninelives Posted January 21, 2009 Share Posted January 21, 2009 I admit, after learning about all the instances that the band has NOT allowed their music to be used (in movies, games, etc) I always thought, 'Why did they allow 'Rock & Roll' to be used in that Cadillac commercial?'... but IMO it was a localized instance.. Maybe the rationale behind it was it being Robert's favorite car.. who knows? I do think they're fairly consistent in keeping the integrity of their music intact, though. Imagine using a LZ song to sell car insurance or diapers or cell phones.. it would be too, no pun intended, commercial. I don't know what was the factor behind their decision to license the song to Cadillac but artists putting their songs in commercials is often a way to reach a broader audience - just basic marketing. And I'm sure some do it purely for the money. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dpat Posted January 28, 2009 Share Posted January 28, 2009 Iggy Pop is selling car insurance: http://www.worldcarfans.com/9090106.008/pu...s-car-insurance Iggy Pop had his collaboration with David Bowie "Lust for Life" played during Carnival (ship) cruise line commercials -- most folks probably didn't realize the song Carnival chose had some edgy lyrics: "Here comes Johnny Yen again With the liquor and drugs And the flesh machine He's gonna do another strip tease. Hey man, where'd ya get that lotion? Your skin starts itching once you buy the gimmick About something called love Love, love, love Well, thats like hypnotizing chickens. Well, Im just a modern guy Of course, Ive had it in the ear(?) before And I've a lust for life 'Cause Ive a lust for life " Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Knebby Posted January 28, 2009 Share Posted January 28, 2009 Bob Dylan has licensed "Blowin' In the Wind" to the Co-Op. It could have at least been Heinz Baked Beans. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigzepfan Posted January 28, 2009 Share Posted January 28, 2009 Cadillac was definitely before 2008. I was surprised at the ringtones, but thought it was all part of a grand comeback tour. Mothership Ringtones The new The Song Remains The Same Verizon ad with zepicons. Reunion Show ????? What could have been. OH and I'm sooo glad they didn't do the video game thing. that would put them in the same class with all others. A class they should not be in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ninelives Posted January 28, 2009 Share Posted January 28, 2009 Bob Dylan has licensed "Blowin' In the Wind" to the Co-Op. It could have at least been Heinz Baked Beans. :lol: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SuperDave Posted January 29, 2009 Share Posted January 29, 2009 Bob Dylan has licensed "Blowin' In the Wind" to the Co-Op. It could have at least been Heinz Baked Beans. Quick thinking. That's a good one!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
audioservant Posted January 29, 2009 Share Posted January 29, 2009 I think no band should be accused by their fans because of "sellout". Sellout to what? Let's just say the song remains the same If you like a song, there's no reason to like it less if its played in a commercial Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ddot Posted January 29, 2009 Share Posted January 29, 2009 ah the selling out thread, the whole idea in the 60's and early 70's was to NOT sell out. the music was supposed to serve a higher purpose than to just make money. The counter cultural revolution was about peace and being yourself, a rejection of commercialism and war. but then the hippies turned into yuppies and the music industry became a vehicle for MTV to sell commercial time, the hippies after all had to eat, the Greatful Dead was a great way to sell acid. Zeppelin because of their break up was spared this ugly transition, now reappearring on the scene 25 years later the original context is lost. Luckily for us the music speaks for itself and no matter what context Zeppelin is put into the sense of self expression and freedom cannot be watered down. Even if the guys did sell out properly, such as Robert touring just for the money, it can never take away from their individual and combined achievments. IMNSHOP Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A Traveler Posted January 29, 2009 Share Posted January 29, 2009 I'm Old School. Neil Young had it right in his This Note's for You: Don't sing for Pepsi Don't sing for Coke Don't sing for nobody Makes me look like a joke I vaguely remember a snippet from an interview in which Robert was asked about that tune (in the context of a special report on rock endorsements, featuring at least one commercial of Robert downing a bottle of Coke to the tune of "Tall Cool One" on Japanese television). I don't remember exactly what he said, but I do remember that his tone was pretty sheepish. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ninelives Posted January 29, 2009 Share Posted January 29, 2009 I'm Old School. Neil Young had it right in his This Note's for You: Don't sing for Pepsi Don't sing for Coke Don't sing for nobody Makes me look like a joke I vaguely remember a snippet from an interview in which Robert was asked about that tune (in the context of a special report on rock endorsements, featuring at least one commercial of Robert downing a bottle of Coke to the tune of "Tall Cool One" on Japanese television). I don't remember exactly what he said, but I do remember that his tone was pretty sheepish. It was on MTV - an interview with Kurt Loder (If you're thinking of the same one as me). Basically his attitude was he totally accepted Neil Young's stance on it but he (Robert) felt that if he could reach a broader based audience, he didn't see the harm. Of course then he joked that he was going to do a commercial for a hotel chain in Colorado where the beds were really nice Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
68/80 guy Posted February 1, 2009 Share Posted February 1, 2009 Big deal !!! God forbid a younger kid could get exposed to a older band and like it because they heard it in a cool t.v. spot. Why was it cool you ask ? Because it was a good song from a good band !! My kid's love all the newer top 20 b.s. song's, But they also love older rock music from me playing it and games like guitar hero. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
docron Posted February 1, 2009 Share Posted February 1, 2009 I would say this is worse than the "Robert wrecked the reunion" threads.., but it's not... ... probably created by the same retarded suck of a person though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cheshire Posted February 3, 2009 Share Posted February 3, 2009 i didnt know zep did an ad.. thought theyd never do such a thing... hurumph i say to you Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eternal light Posted February 3, 2009 Share Posted February 3, 2009 In some ways Robert Plant reminds me of http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vYEXzx-TINc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ninelives Posted February 3, 2009 Share Posted February 3, 2009 In some ways Robert Plant reminds me of [url=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vYEXzx-TINc]Mikey. :rolleyes: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigzepfan Posted February 4, 2009 Share Posted February 4, 2009 In some ways Robert Plant reminds me of http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vYEXzx-TINc. How so?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eternal light Posted February 4, 2009 Share Posted February 4, 2009 How so?? His willingness to try new things. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Rover Posted January 20, 2013 Share Posted January 20, 2013 I've brought up this thread to say, that while Zeppelin imo, tastefully lent their "Rock'n'Roll" to Cadillac, it looks like The Rolling Stones have sold their souls (again), and are selling their "Sympathy For The Devil", to Mercedes-Benz, for an upcoming promotion beginning Feb. 3rd. (SuperBowl Sunday). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shadecatcher Posted January 20, 2013 Share Posted January 20, 2013 I don't find songwriters selling rights to their music to ad companies absurd. What is absurd is the idea that anyone would consider buying a car based on the music in its ad. When I see an ad that uses popular music my immediate thought is that they should have put the money for the song's rights toward making a better product or a reduced retail price. it would be more appropriate IMO for ad companies to commission original works and credit songwriters. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darrin_h2000 Posted January 20, 2013 Share Posted January 20, 2013 As long as there isnt a bunch of changes...you can make money...but just dont let them screw up the music... What I hate is when after the effort of the NFL to ban the Gary Glitter song because he was using the money to rape little girls in the brothels in the eastern rim...Hewlet Packard turns arround and uses "Do you wanna touch me" in their ads... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shadecatcher Posted January 20, 2013 Share Posted January 20, 2013 As long as there isnt a bunch of changes...you can make money...but just dont let them screw up the music... What I hate is when after the effort of the NFL to ban the Gary Glitter song because he was using the money to rape little girls in the brothels in the eastern rim...Hewlet Packard turns arround and uses "Do you wanna touch me" in their ads... Whether a song is purchased by a fan or for use in an ad, it would be fruitless to monitor how the artist uses the income. Glitter would not be alone is spending his money on such services, if in fact he actually does. And what about people who make their money in businesses other than the music industry? The only difference between those with profile and wealth and anyone else is that they can perhaps afford to hide their actions more effectively. Why should public people be held to any different standard than the rest of the population? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darrin_h2000 Posted January 20, 2013 Share Posted January 20, 2013 Whether a song is purchased by a fan or for use in an ad, it would be fruitless to monitor how the artist uses the income. Glitter would not be alone is spending his money on such services, if in fact he actually does. And what about people who make their money in businesses other than the music industry? The only difference between those with profile and wealth and anyone else is that they can perhaps afford to hide their actions more effectively. Why should public people be held to any different standard than the rest of the population? Yeah...but everybody knows that Gary Glitter does that...and yes Pete Townsend...Micheal Jackson...R. Kelly...etc... Shouldnt we all be held up to those standards...Pete...Micheal...and R Kelly didnt have to serve one day...here in the USA the unfamous pedophiles serve up to 25 years on each count... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shadecatcher Posted January 20, 2013 Share Posted January 20, 2013 Yeah...but everybody knows that Gary Glitter does that...and yes Pete Townsend...Micheal Jackson...R. Kelly...etc... Shouldnt we all be held up to those standards...Pete...Micheal...and R Kelly didnt have to serve one day...here in the USA the unfamous pedophiles serve up to 25 years on each count... I definitely think everyone should be subject to the same laws penalties. The problem is though, sometimes we are dealing with allegations some of which may be speculation, media jump up, what might be fairly accurate guessing. If someone is convicted of a crime beyond all doubt, then no amount of payola should excuse them from appropriate punishment, whether they are a government official, celebrity or the guy next door. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.